Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:05:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:05:27 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:27406 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:05:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 To: hadi@cyberus.ca (jamal) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:11:03 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux-Kernel), netdev@oss.sgi.com, torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) In-Reply-To: from "jamal" at Oct 08, 2001 11:57:11 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Agreed if you add the polling cardbus bit. > Note polling cardbus would require more changes than the above. I don't think it does. There are two pieces to the problem a) Not dying horribly b) Handling it elegantly b) is driver specific (NAPI etc) and I think well understood to the point its being used already for performance reasons a) is as simple as if(stuck_in_irq(foo) && irq_shared(foo)) { disable_real_irq(foo); timer_fake_irq_foo(); } We know spoofing a shared irq is safe. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/