Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:14:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:13:56 -0400 Received: from [216.191.240.114] ([216.191.240.114]:43909 "EHLO shell.cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:13:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:11:12 -0400 (EDT) From: jamal To: Alan Cox cc: Jeff Garzik , Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar , Linux-Kernel , , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Agreed if you add the polling cardbus bit. > > Note polling cardbus would require more changes than the above. > > I don't think it does. I was repsonding to your earlier comment that: > Once you disable the IRQ and kick over to polling the cardbus and the > ethernet both still get regular service. Ok so your pps rate and your > latency are unpleasant, but you are not dead. basically pointing that we'll need more work to be done to get Ingos patch to poll the cardbus and eth0 in the example i gave. those will have to be per driver. Did i miss something? Agree on your other points there cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/