Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp837655ybi; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:29:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjPnfA4DamYnLfdJuGfRNoO2DClFKmMT2FPmtJXaHfsSRtwE4jXgMmv8eZCu5u05xjRMdP X-Received: by 2002:a63:dc56:: with SMTP id f22mr10688030pgj.305.1562934555959; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:29:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562934555; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UcHFkRE7bgYkatn/POWJ1koSkNDNilBCxVYFP3Gq2yRpzaX/0nmjwOAXaM6IywFwty 0wcfdDoDEkzXsrmvODsM/GJX1R0hzMrzg3eihSvo7RyWa9ryL/bZvgILvMaW582bI0YC Cm10yo+BWC841QAaNFirBDhWN/JANX8jAZGhvIAnJK45dUep46No6o0PbJj2TAsmANpd UEbQRlKDTivWdegCGox8iittqzjtdtuCRhCxnWB5HklFilT+O/0ww2KG2eQCQmYBWsIs FdkO8oko6Qx9aS/u4FGlV2chbXgpL14ZIAyiYIop/RuLP79jpVwUtGQBKTxdRUuBOQH1 kU6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=1MtP4D+gcstZNnSVY2RZ36HX4cysLo3HV9Ifa7BRLzA=; b=Bhdn6BHHgV2kjOOPF8UvX39XkqnkL8wAnAyJWrgLp+w61dXAzDqGdKX4s+J22H5JrP QOn+XfeB55wiTxmXLz0eskvdy3vT+vgzit71HW1bsInTph6G5UIPK0QJ5hlvllHsxC70 7o/4JII4EU5bejZWZGUiG/V0HnA8/upSHIWsp4qsDgLMFJ/8oS8Cr2lTDeY3x6ianz8n V3ycoZZNusHAVEpjpT/DIPw68hG/rxGsLbNY5M4z0AjnSxTaoHhq5+bfAxi5UrAhOZiD uWuDGhWs3/HIvea2dOZc1zwi/Uz67O05qS2DDhCaRNo7N/Wi6sOwcKD6OMXUtVAYnkdb tZGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=aKyvu595; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n6si8654454pgl.419.2019.07.12.05.29.00; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=aKyvu595; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728196AbfGLM2D (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 08:28:03 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41364 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728280AbfGLM2C (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 08:28:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B38B208E4; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:28:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1562934481; bh=OEUtpqy8TaVlC4ATZK6ZIDpbuemkRobvqkRMAEHHcho=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aKyvu595hlt6IDeSvhvhkedumA75T7ep6SyWFJHq73ckcyxFdA1XQhLY9zW0yCIX1 p5+z2PnIPint6SUvD951OCNOWi5xVPOAZqK5aWHjpEWbXlbOcnSfL9B/Rnz+0BB8Og b3xIw7k8wMKHJMDJ+cavjH/9CP0Ar6jR6EIUB6eE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.1 067/138] bpf, x64: fix stack layout of JITed bpf code Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:18:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20190712121631.241175596@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190712121628.731888964@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190712121628.731888964@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ Upstream commit fe8d9571dc50232b569242fac7ea6332a654f186 ] Since commit 177366bf7ceb the %rbp stopped pointing to %rbp of the previous stack frame. That broke frame pointer based stack unwinding. This commit is a partial revert of it. Note that the location of tail_call_cnt is fixed, since the verifier enforces MAX_BPF_STACK stack size for programs with tail calls. Fixes: 177366bf7ceb ("bpf: change x86 JITed program stack layout") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 74 +++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index afabf597c855..d88bc0935886 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -190,9 +190,7 @@ struct jit_context { #define BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE 128 #define BPF_INSN_SAFETY 64 -#define AUX_STACK_SPACE 40 /* Space for RBX, R13, R14, R15, tailcnt */ - -#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 37 +#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 20 /* * Emit x86-64 prologue code for BPF program and check its size. @@ -203,44 +201,19 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf) u8 *prog = *pprog; int cnt = 0; - /* push rbp */ - EMIT1(0x55); - - /* mov rbp,rsp */ - EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5); - - /* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth + AUX_STACK_SPACE */ - EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC, - round_up(stack_depth, 8) + AUX_STACK_SPACE); - - /* sub rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xED, AUX_STACK_SPACE); - - /* mov qword ptr [rbp+0],rbx */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x5D, 0); - /* mov qword ptr [rbp+8],r13 */ - EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x6D, 8); - /* mov qword ptr [rbp+16],r14 */ - EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x75, 16); - /* mov qword ptr [rbp+24],r15 */ - EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x7D, 24); - + EMIT1(0x55); /* push rbp */ + EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5); /* mov rbp, rsp */ + /* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth */ + EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC, round_up(stack_depth, 8)); + EMIT1(0x53); /* push rbx */ + EMIT2(0x41, 0x55); /* push r13 */ + EMIT2(0x41, 0x56); /* push r14 */ + EMIT2(0x41, 0x57); /* push r15 */ if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) { - /* - * Clear the tail call counter (tail_call_cnt): for eBPF tail - * calls we need to reset the counter to 0. It's done in two - * instructions, resetting RAX register to 0, and moving it - * to the counter location. - */ - - /* xor eax, eax */ - EMIT2(0x31, 0xc0); - /* mov qword ptr [rbp+32], rax */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x45, 32); - + /* zero init tail_call_cnt */ + EMIT2(0x6a, 0x00); BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt != PROLOGUE_SIZE); } - *pprog = prog; } @@ -285,13 +258,13 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog) * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ - EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, 36); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp + 36] */ + EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, -36 - MAX_BPF_STACK); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - 548] */ EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */ #define OFFSET2 (30 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE) EMIT2(X86_JA, OFFSET2); /* ja out */ label2 = cnt; EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */ - EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, 36); /* mov dword ptr [rbp + 36], eax */ + EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, -36 - MAX_BPF_STACK); /* mov dword ptr [rbp -548], eax */ /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ EMIT4_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x84, 0xD6, /* mov rax, [rsi + rdx * 8 + offsetof(...)] */ @@ -1040,19 +1013,14 @@ xadd: if (is_imm8(insn->off)) seen_exit = true; /* Update cleanup_addr */ ctx->cleanup_addr = proglen; - /* mov rbx, qword ptr [rbp+0] */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x5D, 0); - /* mov r13, qword ptr [rbp+8] */ - EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x6D, 8); - /* mov r14, qword ptr [rbp+16] */ - EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x75, 16); - /* mov r15, qword ptr [rbp+24] */ - EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x7D, 24); - - /* add rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC5, AUX_STACK_SPACE); - EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */ - EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */ + if (!bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog)) + EMIT1(0x5B); /* get rid of tail_call_cnt */ + EMIT2(0x41, 0x5F); /* pop r15 */ + EMIT2(0x41, 0x5E); /* pop r14 */ + EMIT2(0x41, 0x5D); /* pop r13 */ + EMIT1(0x5B); /* pop rbx */ + EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */ + EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */ break; default: -- 2.20.1