Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190627204446.52499-1-evgreen@chromium.org> <CAFqH_53cmq+1Y_uL3D4-84v_vDJsoB0Qxr_zTVnOzX1XD7VEgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190701060137.GB4652@dell> <14282971-65b1-f7db-26b9-d33636054ba6@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <14282971-65b1-f7db-26b9-d33636054ba6@collabora.com>
From:   Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:04:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE=gft6e46pL4-4eC5LPUgePj4ibWzJPzKHJ3_oeFuwoM0K+QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Expose resume result via debugfs
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
        Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatja@chromium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 6:41 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@collabora.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/7/19 8:01, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Evan, Lee,
> >>
> >> Missatge de Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org> del dia dj., 27 de juny
> >> 2019 a les 22:46:
> >>>
> >>> For ECs that support it, the EC returns the number of slp_s0
> >>> transitions and whether or not there was a timeout in the resume
> >>> response. Expose the last resume result to usermode via debugfs so
> >>> that usermode can detect and report S0ix timeouts.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> >>
> >> Lee, actually this patch depends on some patches from chrome-platform
> >> to apply cleanly. Once is fine with you and if you're happy to have
> >> this merged for 5.3, I can just carry the patch with me, shouldn't be
> >> any conflicts with your current changes or if you prefer I can create
> >> an immutable branch for you.
> >
> > I won't be taking any more patches this cycle, so if you're sure that
> > it does not conflict, there is no need for an immutable branch.
> >
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
>
> Thanks Lee.
>
> I think the patch is simple enough, I queued for the autobuilders to play with,
> and if all goes well I'll add for 5.3 via chrome-platform.
>

I was hoping to pick this patch from a maintainer's tree, has it
landed anywhere?
-Evan