Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp1414133ybi; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyd3jXTPsg1JxNGOqDJ0wurMfr2jq/8JQk7cGHH4M5OsPp4EhuCc9ARhWUbK6w27vWDx0cY X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a116:: with SMTP id s22mr14722368pjp.47.1562971604191; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562971604; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BeWDoQXAytJG9I12YsqoEEI1SnyXXTgUZTm/wt2JLZaNdfGTbramjHlWrI66SO2UeO DUnbAy2O8w8w39UaaWTKOy8wej78aRbuUm2VMI1ZZQnqr4rAHJO9nUa8pusslGIMPhA+ CR+QlKhD6zDu2v2jLCwmq25AdUFPhACYmJu0ktdJfY7y30fVlCXP6BMhxf7VgzHmHpkF 0F5oL+xJx11636ZANoYr1s9sPLsBgIFKshG0QQZGAOz18Bu7P4RaBpuPe4i7SKzhLsy4 WrKqC3sN72q+5SKo03l9rQIrnCX8G5Lp12Ok+Dmo0/z9BQwkmPyG90mVk+l7MXx0vHkk DamQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=QVZ9FTtnyBaMabPmQABQF+fg7y2pvqd6zAlexPkCzH8=; b=b3yag3/NRcRz1JchcYTtPYAZL3LgPhzUB6f6WXJ0zyK/qlV0rezkjvcp+1zRvJrpQL qOoO8DS+/MedBShkkSx6Al6oICzR3sIMjn8z+6cbBTi5YWlb153hlD1NxeMmkdUqGFVv BCoFrzYHk3eyVVqhqnarzUFTnegvFAyCfRUkQV13Kwr1VCIvKJtMYskSzbJXy/uoNyQM efR2Hb7twoQKG7sOYKfrCXty7qvarH9dnY5wLf/dZMKVPAu/qyyvj1964xrPKNCWBak/ +8T03hnBTzcfHPImXk/M5G02NkrmijZYJZZsbAtWhtNMJoi+tk4UnNd7EpwI5LLSscWf u0rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si2087446pga.414.2019.07.12.15.46.28; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728126AbfGLWqI (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:46:08 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:34452 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727994AbfGLWqI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:46:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44A9A14E038D1; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190712.154606.493382088615011132.davem@davemloft.net> To: cai@lca.pw Cc: sathya.perla@broadcom.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com, somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, arnd@arndb.de, dhowells@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] be2net: fix adapter->big_page_size miscaculation From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1562959401-19815-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> References: <1562959401-19815-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Qian Cai Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:23:21 -0400 > The commit d66acc39c7ce ("bitops: Optimise get_order()") introduced a > problem for the be2net driver as "rx_frag_size" could be a module > parameter that can be changed while loading the module. Why is this a problem? > That commit checks __builtin_constant_p() first in get_order() which > cause "adapter->big_page_size" to be assigned a value based on the > the default "rx_frag_size" value at the compilation time. It also > generate a compilation warning, rx_frag_size is not a constant, therefore the __builtin_constant_p() test should not pass. This explanation doesn't seem valid.