Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp3902240ybi; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSwlv+YLPSnltfSB+lSgacj4RfCSlpOgN7DpC5oFKyOknMQ1MAKp7S+l4HMqPHAF5S6m1X X-Received: by 2002:a63:8ac3:: with SMTP id y186mr25271498pgd.13.1563175872769; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:31:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563175872; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H+C+qMRNnNkZAr33SiMYbaySENPYVVZOYaAdrVaVYE9YE9XvJuEE7/7MYaM0DyAqxB 2Ow0ZgPsTUBtLBG1n3lyswiLrQKxvMUAmoDo+C006uorPeJtUffSzb/dedKA4QhdCasr ++6pj1jfAGGDYRtnd94lb7dZmLD99S8WX32giVs17QbYFXZtf8boO8i3eI2acw+9bFfG 9oimzXlqp9kP9gkIjQC971tpTw6uKjMTWef4xKSlVkZHJ/czLRllyaLrIkneLaaXylfj inay+1ItLgNuUcEoNcm0rJk6jU8WTlv8xgVdVKN52GJcxx4H1r2gRKAkHQ033mBPaB5h BriQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=2QhlA8WUwCD29zKF8Rx7SEuz4y20/atqkalfwrHbPC4=; b=VqX+zoh4bwi1cu+4YC79r8jwLu5JIp4NmIVQViq1FRFxYe+0AdcxPWEQ7dOX21mjH7 0aK8aNwIx0x5j9paSo2cuR9Vosy6R8+DQLOx7PQmAiLnJ/k/ynQtT75kk/GvShwXpXd8 g99UR9FDExLa4u3DKE59r1HPezx6uZ6Xeu1wbzTYUk2EFtMrw/STT7CK9RZqw8Z0NVLl 5IWXBQ25fmWeDLpRnM8lBI0Y1GIHyIoIWC+coUVABmX4Uis54uf+MZ9/H5jQqQ2n1RY5 DarFctkVdeW8fa5jQifTPjhACEZbihz0b24q3aIwLrpruhYta/cG9ft2U4ijK0qKrd1V flfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si15647591pfh.284.2019.07.15.00.30.55; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729180AbfGOHaY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 03:30:24 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:57297 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726948AbfGOHaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 03:30:24 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x6F7U1Kk022633; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 02:30:01 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x6F7Txbx022632; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 02:29:59 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 02:29:59 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nicholas Piggin , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove meaningless KBUILD_ARFLAGS addition Message-ID: <20190715072959.GB20882@gate.crashing.org> References: <20190713032106.8509-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20190713124744.GS14074@gate.crashing.org> <20190713131642.GU14074@gate.crashing.org> <20190713235430.GZ14074@gate.crashing.org> <87v9w393r5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9w393r5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:05:34PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Segher Boessenkool writes: > > Yes, that is why I used the environment variable, all binutils work > > with that. There was no --target option in GNU ar before 2.22. > > Yeah, we're not very good at testing with really old binutils, so I > guess we broke that. > > I'm inclined to merge this, it doesn't seem to break anything, and it > fixes using --target on old binutils that don't have it. But we don't set the target any other way either. I don't think this will work with a 32-bit toolchain (default target 32 bit) and a 64-bit kernel, or the other way around. Then again, does that work at *all* nowadays? Do we even consider that important, *should* it work? Segher