Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932134AbVLCW1h (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:27:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751301AbVLCW1h (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:27:37 -0500 Received: from krusty.dt.E-Technik.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.163.1]:10926 "EHLO mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751298AbVLCW1g convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:27:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:27:31 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Message-ID: <20051203222731.GC25722@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <1133620598.22170.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051203152339.GK31395@stusta.de> <20051203162755.GA31405@merlin.emma.line.org> <4391CEC7.30905@unsolicited.net> <1133630012.6724.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4391D335.7040008@unsolicited.net> <20051203175355.GL31395@stusta.de> <4391E52D.6020702@unsolicited.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <4391E52D.6020702@unsolicited.net> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1413 Lines: 41 On Sat, 03 Dec 2005, David Ranson wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > >- support for ipfwadm and ipchains was removed during 2.6 > > > > > Surely this one had loads of notice though? I was using iptables with > 2.4 kernels. So was I. And now what? ipfwadm and ipchains should have been removed from 2.6.0 if 2.6.0 was not to support these. That opportunity was missed, the removal wasn't made up for in 2.6.1, so the stuff has to stick until 2.8.0. > >- devfs support was removed during 2.6 > > Did this affect many 'real' users? This doesn't matter. A kernel that calls itself stable CAN NOT remove features unless they had been critically broken from the beginning. And this level of breakage is a moot point, so removal is not justified. > >- removal of kernel support for pcmcia-cs is pending > >- ip{,6}_queue removal is pending > >- removal of the RAW driver is pending > I don't use any of these. I guess pcmcia-cs may be disruptive for laptop > users. Who cares what you or I use? It's a commonly acknowledged policy that "stable" releases do not remove features that are good enough for some. Linux 2.6 is not "stable" in this regard. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/