Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751019AbVLDLhj (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:37:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751023AbVLDLhj (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:37:39 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.199]:54969 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751015AbVLDLhi (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:37:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SIzUKTNvsa8IFs0wxS39jRo/85iqUlJMyPsSKy+ZvzKMiTInhpIABqdookBkrgAw4iGZTOOB9B36/ga+1OMgepN27X4FEGZWszP3bdy9xptHrb6Kk6dIBu5cRRLHlFpWp9+qsvyLR0h3sNH29WXRtXLUKCcR+pZP69k9G8GpuVI= Message-ID: <4392D4FD.3070402@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:37:33 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1763 Lines: 39 Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > These folks have nothing new to innovate here. The memory manager and VM > gets revamped every other release. Exports get broken, binary only > module compatibility busted every rev of the kernel. I spend weeks on > each kernel fixing the breakage. These people don't get it, don't care, > and to be honest, you are wasting your time here trying to convince > them. It's never stable because they don't want it to be. This is how > they maintain control > of this code. I have apps written for Windows in 1990 and 1998 that > still run on Windows XP today. Linux has no such concept of > backwards compatiblity. Every company who has embraced it outside of > hardware based solutions is dying or has died. IBM is secretly > forking it as we speak and using it to get out of paying for Unix licenses. > As annoying as it is, accept it and live with it. These people have no > sense of loyalty to you or your customers. They don't even care about > each other. Linux is _only_ a kernel, not a complete OS. And in a very big development process [1]. If you want a complete OS get Fedora, openSUSE, Debian, etc. And if you need longer life time, support, certifications get SLES or RHEL. Btw, latest Coverity reports [2] shows things are getting better and the main root of bugs are _drivers_ (53%), and far away filesystems(18%) and inside net(15%). [1] http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/x.jpg [2] http://www.coverity.com/forms/register.php?continue[]=open_source -- Romanes eunt domus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/