Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp109022ybi; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:33:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyq9DIJrmxy5QwN1uTqzlWEQjrQ1ty3n29oGwufuBBaJpOOsgX3WDkvtG9xU2JTIdbJgZIN X-Received: by 2002:a63:d755:: with SMTP id w21mr30181883pgi.311.1563237215977; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:33:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563237215; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0yxG+8FpSuov5+bRUrNLG9DrfLm+dnLWWjGwfHroExl8SHnw35jcOkNhb9m3Ww5BKf 7dImzasEPr7VcRQpujGGhjVHmwxjF1n0Eps+dk9trkFJU3LYYpbNsc9cQejrcBSzr9hN 1c2TtW7GwZinlwex7mj28jnnMs1FNTnNopNretJ03uXtw90N8jmD3xzZp+ghhG+fycTp kQPi88opGYP8KVA2eGDeNx6q1wcLsg/T5z687gCUpA/dGjixthB0DwZitBPZ6fCMc9aY wlsyA81M+ihEh+/Qq2TR7rWOyqv3XsUYpU0qDhtYRWnw2uoFu807/b8sunhHWEaSH5RV pEuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Uugaky653A1JpaZPRMTx+p5czfLSWEx2enKTwpxrogw=; b=Sqi73twnIt8ApTtioppxTKo3C9Hb0z+xlB23peuVGqklMbfVzFWRwRMvTTUtaG/uV0 4P58t4UX6w9P6TCdlzk7YqWQAaFbX8LyjreaBZmYquMKkvGdqOtCvDB5qHKGjDq0dh1G gI0z7xveqRgIuYF10e3OEeW9KmTgarYBARboT/0VTQJVTlpH+W55SLX13FkRoWCM2Idu wBrt+8HtQ4sscugZzAFtrNREydYtbf7N1/lXDblrtqgBo89zckL6T2ebeiU0u3yyvcoo lSNIow6I4Vq56+wMHNHNIhdAXgzBvjCzX2TKNTNSUFUMRA925YlJRI1l+8EYOh9hPP6h LMmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w10si16353592plq.403.2019.07.15.17.33.19; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732751AbfGPAcX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:32:23 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:41711 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730383AbfGPAcX (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:32:23 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jul 2019 17:32:23 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,494,1557212400"; d="scan'208";a="318836457" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.137]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2019 17:32:23 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2220301AE9; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:32:22 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Uros Bizjak , LKML , X86 ML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH, x86]: Disable CPA cache flush for selfsnoop targets Message-ID: <20190716003222.GJ32439@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <8736j7gsza.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20190715193836.GF32439@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20190715225305.GI32439@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 04:10:36PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:53 PM Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > I haven't tested on a real kernel with i915. Does i915 really hit > > > this code path? Does it happen more than once or twice at boot? > > > > Yes some workloads allocate/free a lot of write combined memory > > for graphics objects. > > > > But where does that memory come from? If it's from device memory > (i.e. memory that's not in the kernel direct map), then, unless I > missed something, we're never changing the cache mode per se -- we're > just ioremap_wc-ing it, which doesn't require a flush. Integraded graphics doesn't have device memory. There's an reserved memory area, but a lot of the buffers the GPU works with come from main memory. -Andi