Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932219AbVLDNxx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:53:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932221AbVLDNxw (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:53:52 -0500 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:22182 "HELO ilport.com.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932219AbVLDNxw (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:53:52 -0500 From: Denis Vlasenko To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:53:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <20051203152339.GK31395@stusta.de> <1133624383.22170.23.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1133624383.22170.23.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512041553.34195.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 679 Lines: 17 On Saturday 03 December 2005 17:39, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > IOW, we should e.g. ensure that today's udev will still work flawlessly > > with kernel 2.6.30 (sic)? > > I'd say yes. It doesn't need to support all new functionality, but at > least what it does today it should be able to do then. If that really > isn't possible maybe udev should be part of the kernel build and per > kernel version. I agree with this idea. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/