Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp524031ybi; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:06:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/+g8Y7NSAgXZOJr8/6Oq3dtCyPw4qsdJVgbOGTlS0xI3Zu9Gv/mwLO2AC8xHQTIsHNDet X-Received: by 2002:a63:231c:: with SMTP id j28mr5165465pgj.430.1563264412229; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:06:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563264412; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Yik3ddR9u2oq80QV/PDdWREMmB1OnV05kMrnUXMk+3lq/AGvxs34WeJ6UA2ji8irbW d/axkuXFUkLTCoHhrkMoVFe0fIdXVb2Z28cZmERIPljmevood8laOvB6OzaCJGdUCpZw BNbMP6BxA1FEQGzIgY/dNzNIM5lPMhLp7iKzluWFY96XIkpgJzE8WVAqAIi4xfmz78WE EbQuv6RByurMOd/v+tczDxLUrUfWPMvSYLroGBnksK1/dm/8+nayDaDNFfxVpkwNQVzS o6WOIAYLVbRpQmX6iNf1bYsiioWVXid2QKFKDxlICkay3DvmPN6L6dbSUy3HWF9e0dtL VKmA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=5j1xq37Ermp9huz0gnBXASgM80EPXOCfRVCxRisazx8=; b=L6kH7QTJQFBCSIIYe3bDJhNszh/bYHX6sllqDp8K3tnQurWGk7Vw5DlyNK0HNEN7PE gO3rYxOm5/STl2Yy25O+BixHd5iPJujQ6qxXWbM+avq3l4svFioM7muUaMEi1LoRKDgx kJBdh1M+yJl56FXuNyllSQ7JDrekl4fKydp+y0nN4DDoPKjdV/3OUmhXGb3JKCAz+xWs 2jci7FWP0RS8Uqr+7UlD6dITMPWx+xsQa5dbF0A4BjZ2+7O96x4E8AmSVsbGQ4tpXTGI waq0PItpTAMwr7YlcTL7FzSBce+GSt1TeLypoGINdzqK36KmeF/NzWh4cQO6qf+PztoU xT0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=r1Dux4Hb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z24si17595799plo.159.2019.07.16.01.06.35; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=r1Dux4Hb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730533AbfGPIGQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 04:06:16 -0400 Received: from hqemgate16.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:11845 "EHLO hqemgate16.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725770AbfGPIGQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 04:06:16 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate16.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:06:12 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:06:14 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:06:14 -0700 Received: from tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:06:12 +0000 Received: by tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 856C842897; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:06:10 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:06:10 +0300 From: Peter De Schrijver To: Joseph Lo CC: Sowjanya Komatineni , Dmitry Osipenko , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 11/18] clk: tegra210: Add support for Tegra210 clocks Message-ID: <20190716080610.GE12715@pdeschrijver-desktop.Nvidia.com> References: <3938092a-bbc7-b304-641d-31677539598d@nvidia.com> <932d4d50-120c-9191-6a9a-23bf9c96633b@nvidia.com> <0ee055ad-d397-32e5-60ee-d62c14c6f77b@gmail.com> <86fc07d5-ab2e-a52a-a570-b1dfff4c20fe@nvidia.com> <20190716083701.225f0fd9@dimatab> <21266e4f-16b1-4c87-067a-16c07c803b6e@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-NVConfidentiality: public User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL108.nvidia.com (172.18.146.13) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1563264372; bh=5j1xq37Ermp9huz0gnBXASgM80EPXOCfRVCxRisazx8=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To: X-NVConfidentiality:User-Agent:X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=r1Dux4Hb74DdPXC8TK54LZSuLoI+I8R5cMuBnTbraZDC7YBJYZWpBrJALUNyXEcSI MNKQEFfCqn6k3NHuFBZxui4ybcpWl1EQlrqILVDjj2Kg1GitWX3NOx63n4TKn82EOS 2uv+45pcoFqiS22UthSipP4PHgyxEarC87Nc1bgXuSBeEvgr4l/RDsrrmElXHlcvyy P7ZVsQjDEdftPn9GriTJrzwKDlNnI4NwZyuYnYIU56E25hzetbf04+23pYp4oSYCsV Nt8wdOCLqcddJ2yKoQoRP3bL4c7WlIwGU7w2Rw2c/DP9yGn8ryxJ8YT90FdMn1zKQE QOJavxHgVmtkA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:24:26PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote: > > OK, Will add to CPUFreq driver... > > > > > > The other thing that also need attention is that T124 CPUFreq driver > > > implicitly relies on DFLL driver to be probed first, which is icky. > > > > > Should I add check for successful dfll clk register explicitly in > > CPUFreq driver probe and defer till dfll clk registers? > > Sorry, I didn't follow the mail thread. Just regarding the DFLL part. > > As you know it, the DFLL clock is one of the CPU clock sources and > integrated with DVFS control logic with the regulator. We will not switch > CPU to other clock sources once we switched to DFLL. Because the CPU has > been regulated by the DFLL HW with the DVFS table (CVB or OPP table you see > in the driver.). We shouldn't reparent it to other sources with unknew > freq/volt pair. That's not guaranteed to work. We allow switching to > open-loop mode but different sources. > > And I don't exactly understand why we need to switch to PLLP in CPU idle > driver. Just keep it on CL-DVFS mode all the time. > > In SC7 entry, the dfll suspend function moves it the open-loop mode. That's > all. The sc7-entryfirmware will handle the rest of the sequence to turn off > the CPU power. > > In SC7 resume, the warmboot code will handle the sequence to turn on > regulator and power up the CPU cluster. And leave it on PLL_P. After > resuming to the kernel, we re-init DFLL, restore the CPU clock policy (CPU > runs on DFLL open-loop mode) and then moving to close-loop mode. > > The DFLL part looks good to me. BTW, change the patch subject to "Add > suspend-resume support" seems more appropriate to me. > To clarify this, the sequences for DFLL use are as follows (assuming all required DFLL hw configuration has been done) Switch to DFLL: 0) Save current parent and frequency 1) Program DFLL to open loop mode 2) Enable DFLL 3) Change cclk_g parent to DFLL For OVR regulator: 4) Change PWM output pin from tristate to output 5) Enable DFLL PWM output For I2C regulator: 4) Enable DFLL I2C output 6) Program DFLL to closed loop mode Switch away from DFLL: 0) Change cclk_g parent to PLLP so the CPU frequency is ok for any vdd_cpu voltage 1) Program DFLL to open loop mode For OVR regulator: 2) Change PWM output pin from output to tristate: vdd_cpu will go back to hardwired boot voltage. 3) Disable DFLL PWM output For I2C regulator: 2) Program vdd_cpu regulator voltage to the boot voltage 3) Disable DFLL I2C output 4) Reprogram parent saved in step 0 of 'Switch to DFLL' to the saved frequency 5) Change cclk_g parent to saved parent 6) Disable DFLL Peter.