Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932250AbVLDPXm (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:23:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932251AbVLDPXm (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:23:42 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:35007 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932250AbVLDPXl (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:23:41 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel From: Arjan van de Ven To: Richard Knutsson Cc: Matthias Andree , Linux-Kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <43930A5F.9050802@student.ltu.se> References: <1133620598.22170.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051203152339.GK31395@stusta.de> <20051203162755.GA31405@merlin.emma.line.org> <1133630556.22170.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051203230520.GJ25722@merlin.emma.line.org> <43923DD9.8020301@wolfmountaingroup.com> <20051204121209.GC15577@merlin.emma.line.org> <1133699555.5188.29.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051204132813.GA4769@merlin.emma.line.org> <1133703338.5188.38.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051204142551.GB4769@merlin.emma.line.org> <43930A5F.9050802@student.ltu.se> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:23:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1133709816.5188.57.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [213.93.14.173 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [213.93.14.173 listed in combined.njabl.org] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1064 Lines: 24 > But I do wonder how copyright and GPL can co-exist. Do the copyright > holder own the changes anybody else does to the code? > Anyone care to explain? The GPL *is* copyright. You and I as copyright holders reserve all rights, and then grant selected rights; the rights and the conditions they are granted under are described in the COPYING file. It's a misunderstanding to think that GPL means "no copyright" or "can do anything I want"; in a way the GPL is quite a restrictive license. (while it allows you to distribute, copy and make derived works, it only does allow that under the condition that the result is made available under the GPL as well in full source form, and there's some additional conditions as well) so GPL can copyright are not in conflict, the GPL can exist BECAUSE of copyright actually. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/