Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932258AbVLDQl1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:41:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932271AbVLDQl1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:41:27 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:13214 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932258AbVLDQl1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:41:27 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel From: Arjan van de Ven To: Matthias Andree Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20051204161157.GB17846@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <9a8748490512030629t16d0b9ebv279064245743e001@mail.gmail.com> <20051203201945.GA4182@kroah.com> <20051203211209.GA4937@kroah.com> <1133645895.22170.33.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1133682973.5188.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1133709038.5188.49.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051204161157.GB17846@merlin.emma.line.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:41:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1133714480.5188.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [213.93.14.173 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [213.93.14.173 listed in combined.njabl.org] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1325 Lines: 29 On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 17:11 +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 15:57 +0100, M. wrote: > > > > > > > > if distros would align on those 6months versions those less > > > experienced users would get 5 years support on those kernels. > > > > no distro gives 5 years of support for a kernel done every 6 months; > > they start such projects more like every 18 to 24 months (SuSE used to > > do it a bit more frequently but it seems they also slowed this down). > > SUSE end-user distros (SUSE LINUX ) are released every 6 months > or so, and are supported for 24 months. Their "enterprise server" is > supported for 60 months though, SLES 9 forked off 9.1. sure.. but they don't add new hw support really, and I'd not be surprised if they rebase to a newer upstream kernel after a while. I know we did that for RHL, eg RHL 7.(Y-1) got the kernel of RHL7.Y after RHL7.Y was released, not only to keep the maintenance down, but more so to get all the bugfixes and hardware support out to customers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/