Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 0/1] block, bfq: eliminate latency
 regression with fast drives
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name
References: <20190715105719.20353-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <6867cf11-d7f8-cadf-b9ec-85549bb86af3@kernel.dk>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:11:49 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190715105719.20353-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/15/19 4:57 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> [V2 that should apply cleanly on current HEAD]
> 
> Hi Jens,
> I've spotted a regression on a fast SSD: a loss of I/O-latency control
> with interactive tasks (such as the application start up I usually
> test). Details in the commit.
> 
> I do hope that, after proper review, this commit makes it for 5.3.

If it's a regression, it should have a Fixes: line telling us which
commit originally introduced the regression. This is important for
folks doing backports. Can you add that?

-- 
Jens Axboe