Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp1380410ybi; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySQ7amms7QFPjdbcbo9SOV7wIhOTWb5A0ZjrMqzjVItMFeZPCOgP+0vhrWgsqS/1gNk63a X-Received: by 2002:a63:d555:: with SMTP id v21mr15069147pgi.179.1563311254451; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:07:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563311254; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MBmiEuAIkiGTuKh7yO0zabgeW46wN19IcxcINb9h8XEey/ho1PCwy2s8RQtgq5089W 0PgKrS+d+jlec4QnEtzN9OlsOq92Dm75pXhJKPvhM+pKU32oEeVeh1KZ5WWH1UXlUUYK xNZnaI3CHzan5Tb06g7R0kcvQcmDpjn8WHefaBDnnuLtro0yzLd+BRGCOpJoqYGTlZqS 67rfJJXiMY+aqlhPbhieMe0nLyCV72AEPGBtnfxGetR8B8oks8dH6C/zqF+gqDaxG568 CYpdrrFVikKkkBooNwq9XarF4S5GtIgVZV2BtucmYSr1BbMJlL/XIYgZVVfU4gD9c/rJ 5cpg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=OPAgJi2Jd8SyMl0VBj9gKfsFSn4kesO/BxlPJvRAUVQ=; b=x8lIevD49ootI3ijW6VOdO91Do/AXVxGskOPMh+GQ6uzm+ioxDu/uvBJtOG7gFPcZV jKcvZwHojeuKq65WVIwwUw0oExjcB19P9eGCZn35pifShGUUlCbMTEZNlSSYbvjnrByE ZLG0wMK8NRnsMuwVjr0j9p7AwUGw77vSGRkXhlUmgGOtMODV39CAfYAXk7Hr4qVSHN9S Kza7dAjaKwJ78TjyAVlL6fIRl4xgE4olZ16wnEc8sSHzree8etvwpkigOUZm0ztlkZcU MWvroAhgbIYMTzSVKEg3LgeBkf0/gAnDxEDOf/B0Zfu+1f03zghWS7sEr+zcv52QR90W grZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m24si20311029pgj.127.2019.07.16.14.07.16; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388753AbfGPVGQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:06:16 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51109 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728340AbfGPVGQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:06:16 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hnUeL-0004dd-RC; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:06:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:06:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Neil Horman cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djuran@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add irq spillover warning In-Reply-To: <20190716203906.GC1498@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Message-ID: References: <20190716135917.15525-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20190716160745.GB1498@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> <20190716203906.GC1498@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Neil, On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 09:05:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Because theres already a check of the same variety in do_IRQ, but if the > > > information is available outside the hotpath, I was unaware, and am happy to > > > update this patch to refelct that. > > > > Which check are you referring to? > > > This one: > if (desc != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED) { > pr_emerg_ratelimited("%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector\n", > __func__, smp_processor_id(), > vector); > I figured it was already checking one condition, another wouldn't hurt too much, > but no worries, I'm redoing this in activate_reserved now. That's in the slow path, when handle_irq() failed which is the unlikely case. Thanks, tglx