Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
IronPort-SDR: 0RGylmZ7q/+cpH2mZauRiES1hBIz41p8bF2nW1YB4JTnC/l8OARGfVjKX8yMHZXJDYRe/3Ldg5
 OwlU/xuq9lmg==
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] char: tpm: add new driver for tpm i2c ptp
To:     Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>,
        Oshri Alkobi <oshrialkoby85@gmail.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
        <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        IS20 Oshri Alkoby <oshri.alkoby@nuvoton.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        AP MS30 Linux Kernel community 
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        <gcwilson@us.ibm.com>, <kgoldman@us.ibm.com>,
        <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, IS30 Dan Morav <Dan.Morav@nuvoton.com>,
        <eyal.cohen@nuvoton.com>
References: <20190628151327.206818-1-oshrialkoby85@gmail.com>
 <8e6ca8796f229c5dc94355437351d7af323f0c56.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <79e8bfd2-2ed1-cf48-499c-5122229beb2e@infineon.com>
 <CAM9mBwJC2QD5-gV1eJUDzC2Fnnugr-oCZCoaH2sT_7ktFDkS-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <45603af2fc8374a90ef9e81a67083395cc9c7190.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <6e7ff1b958d84f6e8e585fd3273ef295@NTILML02.nuvoton.com>
 <CAP6Zq1hPo9dG71YFyr7z9rjmi-DvoUZJOme4+2uqsfO+7nH+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>
Message-ID: <bccd2ebf-75b1-d02f-9283-4ffd7aa36616@infineon.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:48:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP6Zq1hPo9dG71YFyr7z9rjmi-DvoUZJOme4+2uqsfO+7nH+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 15.07.2019 10:08, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Jarkko and All,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback and sorry for the late response.
> 
> 
> Due to the amount of work required to handle this technical feedback and 
> project constraints we need to put this task on hold for the near future.
> 
> In the meantime, anyone from the community is welcome to take over this 
> code and handle the re-design for the benefit of the entire TPM community.

Too bad you lack the time to finish this.

If somebody else were to pick it up, would it be possible for you to 
provide a couple of TPMs that implement this protocol, so that it can be 
properly tested?

Alexander