Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751304AbVLEBJx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:09:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751314AbVLEBJx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:09:53 -0500 Received: from c-67-177-35-222.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([67.177.35.222]:62094 "EHLO vger.utah-nac.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751304AbVLEBJx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:09:53 -0500 Message-ID: <43938D40.7040804@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:43:44 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Petrovitsch Cc: Matthias Andree , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <1133620598.22170.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051203152339.GK31395@stusta.de> <20051203162755.GA31405@merlin.emma.line.org> <1133630556.22170.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051203230520.GJ25722@merlin.emma.line.org> <43923DD9.8020301@wolfmountaingroup.com> <1133732132.3317.32.camel@gimli.at.home> In-Reply-To: <1133732132.3317.32.camel@gimli.at.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1390 Lines: 50 Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: >On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 17:52 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: >[...] > > >>of this code. I have apps written for Windows in 1990 and 1998 that >> >> > ^^^^ > > >>still run on Windows XP today. Linux has no such concept of >> >> > >But this not even holds for nearly all apps. > > > >>backwards compatiblity. Every company who has embraced it outside of >> >> > >The same holds (probably) for Linux apps (given that your kernel can >start a.out). And AFAIBT by Win* driver developers even in the Win* >world you have to change your driver because of a new Win* version now >and then. > > Bernd > > No. BIND was has been busted between 2.4 and 2.6. Not to mention the whole libc -> glib switchover. It's hilarious that BSD had to create a Linux app compat lib, and the RedHat shipped compat libs for 3 releases as well. Not even close. Windows has won. M$ has won. Linux lost the desktop wars and will soon loose the server wars as well. The reason - infighting and lack of backwards compatibility. Binary only module breakage kernel to kernel will continue. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/