Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:23:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:23:30 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:15376 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:23:13 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-2.4.10-acX To: louisg00@bellsouth.net (Louis Garcia) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:29:12 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1002565315.8915.1.camel@tiger> from "Louis Garcia" at Oct 08, 2001 02:21:54 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Has raw/block I/O changes from linus 2.4.10 been merged? No. There were certain bits of 2.5^H4.10 that I took one look at and threw out for the moment as unsafe for a stable tree - the page cache block device and O_DIRECT stuff included. 2.4.11pre seems to back some of that out too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/