Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp1709020ybi; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzs8RwXkPKfpIGISo7rB6phpf/r1ZWEXd3Kh8e6Ekd+KR8ty5J2EXDMeHDbaTGapi15vPTv X-Received: by 2002:a63:b10f:: with SMTP id r15mr44503282pgf.230.1563420708258; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563420708; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lZ00yNGmV46F/I6mDVW+QM2yr0s4/E4g/TU7VQ4yI3Fw4XJitwXx0ASbNYrJKWyjNd XXKXEH3UX79A9fl/PhN0oYbB+yg8qUNB7UCUHnj3LJCGqCnlQax59tvC9XMHqkJsGoWi eMcdupyE1n7YepLilB25POiN+Hvsv0XuK2spkOBYEKrE0PsO7GV5ZETfXZdseP5HkP47 CQQ7911OHOVdl6hbKnyhEYb9kwt66DErRqR2V6xywP1JYKDnGHS5tEbOcpCxDvSxKBLG oAtvuPSFPhfPWkeXFUkSXyohojwfhugEGtNkjSooiwocdKo+zkPVTT7cpaLGHcK3DG4L DtMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=0+fWpcsjqHz2hWgHUO5TBziD83mNXH+4M9yBM3EJ82o=; b=zuqugHa+OTQ7+V/BACg05/ahT8fJKaA1BazT+Gc/T2W3IMYebkVisG/2Ke38hLCOGJ Xp7oAvjIS4RfOkRxN27PILMRa9y66cXLmh0vjhNl0plyx9zcVfcS1zkXQmOExAsxDMDM V+mAYGXwBLkzplREjiKLb3gAEBoYIQaYZDeLRIMFLIaD8/Fw8fS82pgu3NjDS3+4PpKP vffGbbwczRflkjXx0CS164DvqGQCJnbbHVvBDGgnfdhy5ICQOKnJO/rNNTjzLZ/xiHtT WtGUWqF5OXHiGXIHuqP4jk8vbGy106b+QrQVo6PUYTPjpZSKELVK6JP7w16uCeQ3T5MN iyfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3si22974678pls.52.2019.07.17.20.31.31; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390092AbfGRDa1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Jul 2019 23:30:27 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:56200 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389907AbfGRDaZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2019 23:30:25 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 92BEC43EF11C6CF4ED03; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:30:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:30:19 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to read source block before invalidating it To: Jaegeuk Kim , , References: <20190718013718.70335-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20190718031214.GA78336@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <19a25101-da74-de98-6ca4-a9fd9fa09ef2@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:30:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190718031214.GA78336@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/7/18 11:12, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > f2fs_allocate_data_block() invalidates old block address and enable new block > address. Then, if we try to read old block by f2fs_submit_page_bio(), it will > give WARN due to reading invalid blocks. > > Let's make the order sanely back. Hmm.. to avoid WARM, we may suffer one more memcpy, I suspect this can reduce online resize or foreground gc ioctl performance... Can we just relief to use DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ for this case...? > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Except performance, I'm okay with this change. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, > --- > v2: > I was fixing the comments. :) > > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > index 6691f526fa40..8974672db78f 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > @@ -796,6 +796,29 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, > if (lfs_mode) > down_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock); > > + mpage = f2fs_grab_cache_page(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi), > + fio.old_blkaddr, false); > + if (!mpage) > + goto up_out; > + > + fio.encrypted_page = mpage; > + > + /* read source block in mpage */ > + if (!PageUptodate(mpage)) { > + err = f2fs_submit_page_bio(&fio); > + if (err) { > + f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1); > + goto up_out; > + } > + lock_page(mpage); > + if (unlikely(mpage->mapping != META_MAPPING(fio.sbi) || > + !PageUptodate(mpage))) { > + err = -EIO; > + f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1); > + goto up_out; > + } > + } > + > f2fs_allocate_data_block(fio.sbi, NULL, fio.old_blkaddr, &newaddr, > &sum, CURSEG_COLD_DATA, NULL, false); > > @@ -803,44 +826,18 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, > newaddr, FGP_LOCK | FGP_CREAT, GFP_NOFS); > if (!fio.encrypted_page) { > err = -ENOMEM; > - goto recover_block; > - } > - > - mpage = f2fs_pagecache_get_page(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi), > - fio.old_blkaddr, FGP_LOCK, GFP_NOFS); > - if (mpage) { > - bool updated = false; > - > - if (PageUptodate(mpage)) { > - memcpy(page_address(fio.encrypted_page), > - page_address(mpage), PAGE_SIZE); > - updated = true; > - } > f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1); > - invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi), > - fio.old_blkaddr, fio.old_blkaddr); > - if (updated) > - goto write_page; > - } > - > - err = f2fs_submit_page_bio(&fio); > - if (err) > - goto put_page_out; > - > - /* write page */ > - lock_page(fio.encrypted_page); > - > - if (unlikely(fio.encrypted_page->mapping != META_MAPPING(fio.sbi))) { > - err = -EIO; > - goto put_page_out; > - } > - if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(fio.encrypted_page))) { > - err = -EIO; > - goto put_page_out; > + goto recover_block; > } > > -write_page: > + /* write target block */ > f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(fio.encrypted_page, DATA, true, true); > + memcpy(page_address(fio.encrypted_page), > + page_address(mpage), PAGE_SIZE); > + f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1); > + invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi), > + fio.old_blkaddr, fio.old_blkaddr); > + > set_page_dirty(fio.encrypted_page); > if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(fio.encrypted_page)) > dec_page_count(fio.sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META); > @@ -871,11 +868,12 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, > put_page_out: > f2fs_put_page(fio.encrypted_page, 1); > recover_block: > - if (lfs_mode) > - up_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock); > if (err) > f2fs_do_replace_block(fio.sbi, &sum, newaddr, fio.old_blkaddr, > true, true); > +up_out: > + if (lfs_mode) > + up_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock); > put_out: > f2fs_put_dnode(&dn); > out: >