Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp2011322ybi; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 02:00:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwYKYvixYKMpKWylsx1eAjLJJNoBmXtYBwF3dsgFhyLiLmsXexHcf9bls+xtzzUTDHZ+bnh X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2228:: with SMTP id c37mr50355776pje.9.1563440421891; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 02:00:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563440421; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JE5htRyT6U6QFWnhX8xnrKP15uMREk0n1K50VId3aLD51JAd/jweqcK88mN/r8ql72 X8fij+34hCDuguLdnG/9+MjRMB68XxlePDia9Y9wDs8sEJireG3huQRSHaMlJZnQmVpt kmDV9k72UVYOssVb89vTWNsQsSxf44v121AFdC840B0ovDjQdTzHEggD3fpKWEfv2UKg MltvgCcSqEkfMLOK/vXfSi0KWp7xobVwe5cZFiYi7yUmqX1MdFNO7B+xfgcnHEuCaCDW CprEP6xyQmXVUxa3rF5FkwIGVoCHfbbGN1/LWOTW2qNDflVLPaGTYrJJgSAKuDTzecTh FgLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=uQz3LNTMbd6l463+ndLBGeNycGVNkiTsrDWxlh0BhZw=; b=J6exkG2B/xd7zUa39dn96v/RaG1U0GTT5WyEhD8JMGj+215u+Lekq23CrkgmIQ5zOu PGZhyvUdJckRMQ0XUm2fs5XBJg+k4z95jeZibGuuG0dPLbvmvb4HspCqoy+9PM9eqSli s4CZEr+uKotLoS0wTlVhegPkGOlq/hqVkkEddHI+eDiJu9F0+XmWtt2xXudFe5UTxm+p m8Nw1xVJer+anNprIWsPCvgwOlfd6MvO17P/sXCKWDzDXUoor2UkdqaBn+m1F5zA+Cnu Cx+7vyO4q7ueeXatkm2XiU0SsERVonkrHwq9dfFN4h6iLaYgaeactvbrinwAGBmhg4sH sE7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n129si18809015pgn.254.2019.07.18.02.00.05; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 02:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389596AbfGRI7P (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 04:59:15 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:13975 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726383AbfGRI7O (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 04:59:14 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jul 2019 01:59:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,276,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="158725434" Received: from pipin.fi.intel.com (HELO pipin) ([10.237.72.175]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2019 01:59:11 -0700 From: Felipe Balbi To: Richard Cochran Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Christopher S . Hall" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] PTP: Add flag for non-periodic output In-Reply-To: <20190717173645.GD1464@localhost> References: <20190716072038.8408-1-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> <20190716072038.8408-5-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> <20190716163927.GA2125@localhost> <87k1ch2m1i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20190717173645.GD1464@localhost> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:59:10 +0300 Message-ID: <87ftn3iuqp.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Richard Cochran writes: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:49:13AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> No worries, I'll work on this after vacations (I'll off for 2 weeks >> starting next week). I thought about adding a new IOCTL until I saw that >> rsv field. Oh well :-) > > It would be great if you could fix up the PTP ioctls as a preface to > your series. no problem, anything in particular in mind? Just create new versions of all the IOCTLs so we can actually use the reserved fields in the future? cheers -- balbi