Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751402AbVLESAl (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:00:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751399AbVLESAl (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:00:41 -0500 Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:35260 "EHLO mail.suse.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751397AbVLESAk (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:00:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:00:38 +0100 From: Jiri Benc To: mbuesch@freenet.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, NetDev Subject: Re: Broadcom 43xx first results Message-ID: <20051205190038.04b7b7c1@griffin.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4a (GTK+ 1.2.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1066 Lines: 26 On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:50:08 +0100, mbuesch@freenet.de wrote: > The team is in the progress of writing a SoftwareMAC layer, > which is needed for the bcm device. The SoftMAC is still very > incomplete. So do not expect to do any fancy stuff like WPA > or something line that with it. Why yet another attempt to write 802.11 stack? Sure, the one currently in the kernel is unusable and everybody knows about it. But why not to improve code opensourced by Devicescape some time ago instead of inventing the wheel again and again? Yes, I know that code is not perfect and needs a lot of work, but it is the best piece of code we have available now. And it _does_ support WPA and such - in fact, it is nearly complete. Please take a look at http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jbenc/ Thanks, -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/