Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932503AbVLES0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:26:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932500AbVLES0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:26:14 -0500 Received: from host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com ([213.160.108.25]:48581 "EHLO orac.home") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932503AbVLES0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:26:14 -0500 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:26:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512051826.06703.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 20 On Monday 05 December 2005 10:52, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > a hypothetical doomsday scenario by Arjan van de Ven > Can I ask what prompted your post? > > On December 6th, 2005 the kernel developers en mass decide that binary > modules are legally fine and also essential for the progress of linux, Has anyone (influential) actually being toying with this idea? I hope not, but if they are, I'd like to know who to lobby... Andrew Walrond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/