Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:26:22 +0100
From:   Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/5] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup
 controller
Message-ID: <20190718152327.vmnds3kpagh2xz2r@e110439-lin>
References: <20190708084357.12944-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20190708084357.12944-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20190718145238.GD696309@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190718145238.GD696309@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18-Jul 07:52, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Patrick.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:43:53AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > +static inline void cpu_uclamp_print(struct seq_file *sf,
> > +				    enum uclamp_id clamp_id)
> > +{
> > +	struct task_group *tg;
> > +	u64 util_clamp;
> > +	u64 percent;
> > +	u32 rem;
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	tg = css_tg(seq_css(sf));
> > +	util_clamp = tg->uclamp_req[clamp_id].value;
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > +	if (util_clamp == SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) {
> > +		seq_puts(sf, "max\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	percent = uclamp_percent_from_scale(util_clamp);
> > +	percent = div_u64_rem(percent, 100, &rem);
> > +	seq_printf(sf, "%llu.%u\n", percent, rem);
> 
> "%llu.%02u" otherwise 20.01 gets printed as 20.1

Yup!... good point! :)

Since we already collected many feedbacks, I've got a v12 ready for posting.
Maybe you better wait for that before going on with the review.

Thanks,
Patrick

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi