Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750885AbVLESop (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:44:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751403AbVLESop (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:44:45 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:27154 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750885AbVLESoo (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:44:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:44:42 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Rob Landley Cc: David Ranson , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Andree Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Message-ID: <20051205184442.GI9973@stusta.de> References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <4391D335.7040008@unsolicited.net> <20051203175355.GL31395@stusta.de> <200512042131.13015.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512042131.13015.rob@landley.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1820 Lines: 50 On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 09:31:12PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On Saturday 03 December 2005 11:53, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 05:17:41PM +0000, David Ranson wrote: > > > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > >udev ;) > > > > > > > >http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Dec/0180.html > > > > > > Ahh OK .. I don't use it, so wouldn't have been affected. That's one > > > userspace interface broken during the series, does anyone have any more? > > > > - support for ipfwadm and ipchains was removed during 2.6 > > - devfs support was removed during 2.6 > > - removal of kernel support for pcmcia-cs is pending > > - ip{,6}_queue removal is pending > > - removal of the RAW driver is pending > > So what you're upset about is the feature removal scheduling mechanism, which > usually gives a full year's warning, and the removal patch can be reversed > into a feature addition patch you can maintain outside the tree if you really > care? I'm not upset about is the feature removal scheduling mechanism. Please check who has most entries in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt ... The removal of features within the 2.6 series is an essential part of the current development model. The problem is the lack of a long-living relatively stable series within the development model. > Rob cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/