Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751364AbVLESvN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:51:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751403AbVLESvN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:51:13 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:34834 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751364AbVLESvL (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:51:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:51:10 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Message-ID: <20051205185110.GJ9973@stusta.de> References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <9a8748490512030629t16d0b9ebv279064245743e001@mail.gmail.com> <20051203201945.GA4182@kroah.com> <9a8748490512031948m26b04d3ds9fbc652893ead40@mail.gmail.com> <20051204115650.GA15577@merlin.emma.line.org> <20051204232454.GG8914@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051204232454.GG8914@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1693 Lines: 48 On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 03:24:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:56:50PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > > The problem is the upstream breaking backwards compatibility for no good > > reason. This can sometimes be a genuine unintended regression (aka. > > bug), but quite often this is deliberate breakage because someone wants > > to get rid of cruft. While the motivation is sound, breaking between > > 2.6.N and 2.6.M must stop. > > What are we breaking that people are complaining so much about? > Specifics please. > > And if you bring up udev, please see my previous comments in this thread > about that issue. > > It isn't userspace stuff that is breaking, as applications built on 2.2 > still work just fine here on 2.6 for me. > > Yes we break in-kernel apis, all the time, that's fine. See > Documentation/stable-api-nonsense.txt for details about why we do that. > > So again, specifics please? It's the kernel-related userspace that is the problem (besides regressions that are simply bugs). Be it the devfs removal, the requirement for a more recent wpa_supplicant package or my pending removal of the obsolete raw driver. > thanks, > > greg k-h cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/