Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190717172100.261204-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20190719161404.GA24170@redhat.com> <20190719162726.u5fi5k3tqove6hgn@brauner.io>
In-Reply-To: <20190719162726.u5fi5k3tqove6hgn@brauner.io>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:51:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJWu+orxkFyoTTmFJs23FD0PKX-NetF4kVVLXnWkyLdCU2_cYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1] pidfd: fix a race in setting exit_state for pidfd polling
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@android.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:27 PM Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:14:05PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > it seems that I missed something else...
> >
> > On 07/17, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1156,10 +1157,11 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
> > >             ptrace_unlink(p);
> > >
> > >             /* If parent wants a zombie, don't release it now */
> > > -           state = EXIT_ZOMBIE;
> > > +           p->exit_state = EXIT_ZOMBIE;
> > >             if (do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal))
> > > -                   state = EXIT_DEAD;
> > > -           p->exit_state = state;
> > > +                   p->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD;
> > > +
> > > +           state = p->exit_state;
> > >             write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> >
> > why do you think we also need to change wait_task_zombie() ?
> >
> > pidfd_poll() only needs the exit_state != 0 check, we know that it
> > is not zero at this point. Why do we need to change exit_state before
> > do_notify_parent() ?
>
> Oh, because of?:
>
>         /*
>          * Move the task's state to DEAD/TRACE, only one thread can do this.
>          */
>         state = (ptrace_reparented(p) && thread_group_leader(p)) ?
>                 EXIT_TRACE : EXIT_DEAD;
>         if (cmpxchg(&p->exit_state, EXIT_ZOMBIE, state) != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
>                 return 0;
>
> So exit_state will definitely be set in this scenario. Good point.
>

Agreed. Christian, do you mind dropping this hunk from the patch or do
you want me to resend the patch with the hunk dropped?