Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To:     Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
        linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-headers-5.2 and proper use of SIOCGSTAMP
References: <20190720174844.4b989d34@sf>
Date:   Sat, 20 Jul 2019 20:10:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190720174844.4b989d34@sf> (Sergei Trofimovich's message of
        "Sat, 20 Jul 2019 17:48:44 +0100")
Message-ID: <87wogca86l.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Sergei Trofimovich:

> Should #include <linux/sockios.h> always be included by user app?
> Or should glibc tweak it's definition of '#include <sys/socket.h>'
> to make it available on both old and new version of linux headers?

What is the reason for dropping SIOCGSTAMP from <asm/socket.h>?

If we know that, it will be much easier to decide what to do about
<sys/socket.h>.