Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190708082343.30726-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdb5xKHZja0mkd-wZJ+YHZpGJaDrkA0dv60MNYKXFcPK4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMRc=MfB9R70QDqtjG5a5Roq1roeL78Ss5noytrY-7P=tY1OHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdaiZgK1EoaUxDtbm_GJHVjZU56e_qBQ-OF0mmwb5W8+tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMpxmJWDTkhuWhfSJ-fkJ6r+7a3kErXafQ_sJLVgMf=cA=1+aQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJWDTkhuWhfSJ-fkJ6r+7a3kErXafQ_sJLVgMf=cA=1+aQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 20 Jul 2019 21:44:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYkp0OnyEiUX_VQF_nu5JumkupdsX9fG4rWCf0apNtX5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: don't WARN() on NULL descs if gpiolib is disabled
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Claus H . Stovgaard" <cst@phaseone.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:

> I'll apply it to my local tree and send it for v5.3-rc2.

OK! Do you see it as bug fix so it should go in the rcs?

It pretty much needs to be a regression to go in there,
because this stub stuff blew up in my face before :/

Thanks,
Linus