Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751593AbVLFEIs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:08:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751591AbVLFEIs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:08:48 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:45206 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476AbVLFEIr (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:08:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:08:20 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Tim Bird Cc: Dave Airlie , David Woodhouse , arjan@infradead.org, andrew@walrond.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario Message-ID: <20051206040820.GB26602@kroah.com> References: <21d7e9970512051610n1244467am12adc8373c1a4473@mail.gmail.com> <4394DA1D.3090007@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4394DA1D.3090007@am.sony.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1574 Lines: 40 On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:23:57PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: > >>To the larger argument about supporting binary drivers, > >>all Arjan manages to prove with his post is that, > >>if handled in the worst possible way, support for > >>binary drivers would be a disaster. Who can disagree > >>with that? > >> > > And do you think that given the opportunity, any company is going > > spend the extra money required to not do it in the worst possible > > way?? > > I meant "handled in the worst possible way by > the kernel developers". It *is* possible to define > stable APIs and have them used successfully. > > POSIX is not the greatest example, but it seems > to work OK. I realize that drivers are more > tightly bound to the kernel than are libraries > or applications, but sheesh, this is not rocket > science. For people to think that the kernel developers are just "too dumb" to make a stable kernel api (and yes, I've had people accuse me of this many times to my face[1]) shows a total lack of understanding as to _why_ we change the in-kernel api all the time. Please see Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt for details on this. thanks, greg k-h [1] My usual response is, "If we are so dumb, why are you using the kernel made by us?", which usually stops the conversation right there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/