Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp6756880ybi; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzpyrB1bFezzSEdZ7fRVwtSH+RlR/5E02AHZCIpQpjkZ/H0Kg5dz3Sndj+Q+ADoH/OSpjP X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a410:: with SMTP id y16mr76320099pjp.62.1563782655436; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563782655; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ymy61DBi6hkb9ek2IhnFoGiInGVUmFh0FwzK9UGhaElONelxoj8iNXHHNS/vhzarMf 3c3m/78MMjTgXaCluSUPsql6+2dttNDYiYP0GowUyI8Ii+7N5FlI0/5C5NkjA6j+KjVc MnOUpkpzmeHjy5f5e2+wvXhnwfsZdMA+QRD4CRxnIX10wpvi7W3ILTk8onSfD1fEkSi+ lDKEyGvgtCjuZSqrXMKFdLEu8egAhDALpmE4xEXCiF6xA5Zqdh3lMlQ3BcflnEtmPSbm 1IoyFTvUrY6ny1fXL3ztwZSm7LTIcspUm0t9CmIn4iZIiqQ3hrpVv+a0Ca6946UPcb43 9+sw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=bByVe0wHX2Fq2XabjZI/aT6yvPdN/tyRaOwnK8KYNiY=; b=bu+A1tTGcHqm4OkdS12IHpvISGfqTkNMrTQfhbrzoy56m+jGBCBfFDK5FHuqn41e6T 1dnkVbr+O6qTDSCf2e3/6vTplijHvYiEN/G28zSDimOdbVk8BNsaAepfnOo9rYHn8hwJ o7GhnT1nSou103czHDsV8R2ISlEkB5QXP8vv2Pr47oJ2h/0SZgrMWB3uHckM4CG94BLF 5sly+DBf61rkLLmsXqcEHP20DQIHJe2JaYPDFjcn4XXjBecdH+CquqgQaRS+qTAn8uu2 gdCR2GKGDEvq83PawK7AJWM9GVFtNdWnaRcH70CBMyZgczWUK2UMFdlh6R2NGqp3qnal RI1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x62si8658455pgd.48.2019.07.22.01.03.59; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727753AbfGVICZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 04:02:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59764 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726236AbfGVICY (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 04:02:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269F7308424C; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-120-233.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.233]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54DC610A6; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 04:02:13 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: syzbot , aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, christian@brauner.io, davem@davemloft.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com, guro@fb.com, hch@infradead.org, james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, jglisse@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, ldv@altlinux.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, mhocko@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, wad@chromium.org Subject: Re: WARNING in __mmdrop Message-ID: <20190722035657-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <0000000000008dd6bb058e006938@google.com> <000000000000964b0d058e1a0483@google.com> <20190721044615-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <75c43998-3a1c-676f-99ff-3d04663c3fcc@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <75c43998-3a1c-676f-99ff-3d04663c3fcc@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:21:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/7/21 下午6:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 03:08:00AM -0700, syzbot wrote: > > > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > > > > > commit 7f466032dc9e5a61217f22ea34b2df932786bbfc > > > Author: Jason Wang > > > Date: Fri May 24 08:12:18 2019 +0000 > > > > > > vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address > > > > > > bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=149a8a20600000 > > > start commit: 6d21a41b Add linux-next specific files for 20190718 > > > git tree: linux-next > > > final crash: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=169a8a20600000 > > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=129a8a20600000 > > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3430a151e1452331 > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e58112d71f77113ddb7b > > > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10139e68600000 > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+e58112d71f77113ddb7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual > > > address") > > > > > > For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection > > > > OK I poked at this for a bit, I see several things that > > we need to fix, though I'm not yet sure it's the reason for > > the failures: > > > > > > 1. mmu_notifier_register shouldn't be called from vhost_vring_set_num_addr > > That's just a bad hack, > > > This is used to avoid holding lock when checking whether the addresses are > overlapped. Otherwise we need to take spinlock for each invalidation request > even if it was the va range that is not interested for us. This will be very > slow e.g during guest boot. KVM seems to do exactly that. I tried and guest does not seem to boot any slower. Do you observe any slowdown? Now I took a hard look at the uaddr hackery it really makes me nervious. So I think for this release we want something safe, and optimizations on top. As an alternative revert the optimization and try again for next merge window. -- MST