Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S277135AbRJHVWt>; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:22:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S277138AbRJHVWj>; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:22:39 -0400
Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com ([207.69.200.110]:10017 "EHLO
	smtp6.mindspring.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S277135AbRJHVWY>; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:22:24 -0400
Subject: Re: linux-2.4.10-acX
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <E15qeo4-0001MW-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15qeo4-0001MW-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15.99+cvs.2001.10.05.08.08 (Preview Release)
Date: 08 Oct 2001 17:23:22 -0400
Message-Id: <1002576203.8568.192.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2001-10-08 at 14:07, Alan Cox wrote:

> Much of that will go on to Linus. Some he has refused (faster syscall path,
> elevator flow control, ..). It takes time to feed stuff on and often I want
> to test it in -ac first. Because so much changed in 2.4.10/11pre it's now
> getting very hard to merge a lot of the fixes like the truncate standards
> compliance stuff so they may not make Linus tree until 2.5

What are Linus's complaints about the faster syscall path improvement?

	Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/