Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190614142406.ybdiqfppo5mc5bgq@flea> <CAMty3ZB45cHx3WeXnywBh2_UA_bTmFs6yBTqLWA1BNf4fQtVvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190625144930.5hegt6bkzqzykjid@flea> <CAMty3ZCmj0Rz7MMhLqihsvLQi+1CHf0fAoJQ4QN65xB-bwxaJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190703114933.u3x4ej3v7ocewvif@flea> <CAOf5uw=ZEvMV1hFQE986rNG_ctpReGbjbZzv0m=OzKPdBh57uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190711100100.cty3s6rs3w27low6@flea> <CAOf5uw=3fiMuhcj3kDtCaGNTsxHKRrYb79MXZ+yUZtmf0jU10A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190720065830.zn3txpyduakywcva@flea> <CAMty3ZDE1xiNgHVLihH378dY5szzkr14V-fwLZdvPs12tY+G1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190720093202.6fn6xmhvsgawscnu@flea> <CAMty3ZDpOA1mD77t3RB6hEG7o3+ws8y64m1DU8=3HdZ4zy4AUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZDpOA1mD77t3RB6hEG7o3+ws8y64m1DU8=3HdZ4zy4AUw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:25:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOf5uw=5j+8XNv_ZBhY0yrnjjNnaV_w=a4oiV11LoksAfEY7AA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/22] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add minimum rate for PLL_MIPI
To:     Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jagan

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 3:02 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:46:27PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:28 PM Maxime Ripard
> > > <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> > > > > > > tcon-pixel clock is the rate that you want to achive on display side
> > > > > > > and if you have 4 lanes 32bit or lanes and different bit number that
> > > > > > > you need to have a clock that is able to put outside bits and speed
> > > > > > > equal to pixel-clock * bits / lanes. so If you want a pixel-clock of
> > > > > > > 40 mhz and you have 32bits and 4 lanes you need to have a clock of
> > > > > > > 40 * 32 / 4 in no-burst mode. I think that this is done but most of
> > > > > > > the display.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So this is what the issue is then?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This one does make sense, and you should just change the rate in the
> > > > > > call to clk_set_rate in sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_cpu.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm still wondering why that hasn't been brought up in either the
> > > > > > discussion or the commit log before though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Something like this?
> > > > >
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c     | 20 +++++++++++---------
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h |  2 --
> > > > >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > > index 64c43ee6bd92..42560d5c327c 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > > > > @@ -263,10 +263,11 @@ static int sun4i_tcon_get_clk_delay(const struct
> > > > > drm_display_mode *mode,
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > >  static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > > -                                       const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > > > > +                                       const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > > > > +                                       u32 tcon_mul)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         /* Configure the dot clock */
> > > > > -       clk_set_rate(tcon->dclk, mode->crtc_clock * 1000);
> > > > > +       clk_set_rate(tcon->dclk, mode->crtc_clock * tcon_mul * 1000);
> > > > >
> > > > >         /* Set the resolution */
> > > > >         regmap_write(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_BASIC0_REG,
> > > > > @@ -335,12 +336,13 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_cpu(struct
> > > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > >         u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
> > > > >         u8 lanes = device->lanes;
> > > > >         u32 block_space, start_delay;
> > > > > -       u32 tcon_div;
> > > > > +       u32 tcon_div, tcon_mul;
> > > > >
> > > > > -       tcon->dclk_min_div = SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV;
> > > > > -       tcon->dclk_max_div = SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV;
> > > > > +       tcon->dclk_min_div = 4;
> > > > > +       tcon->dclk_max_div = 127;
> > > > >
> > > > > -       sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode);
> > > > > +       tcon_mul = bpp / lanes;
> > > > > +       sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode, tcon_mul);
> > > > >
> > > > >         /* Set dithering if needed */
> > > > >         sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_dithering(tcon, sun4i_tcon_get_connector(encoder));
> > > > > @@ -366,7 +368,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_cpu(struct
> > > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > >          */
> > > > >         regmap_read(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_DCLK_REG, &tcon_div);
> > > > >         tcon_div &= GENMASK(6, 0);
> > > > > -       block_space = mode->htotal * bpp / (tcon_div * lanes);
> > > > > +       block_space = mode->htotal * tcon_div * tcon_mul;
> > > > >         block_space -= mode->hdisplay + 40;
> > > > >
> > > > >         regmap_write(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_CPU_TRI0_REG,
> > > > > @@ -408,7 +410,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_lvds(struct
> > > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > >
> > > > >         tcon->dclk_min_div = 7;
> > > > >         tcon->dclk_max_div = 7;
> > > > > -       sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode);
> > > > > +       sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode, 1);
> > > > >
> > > > >         /* Set dithering if needed */
> > > > >         sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_dithering(tcon, sun4i_tcon_get_connector(encoder));
> > > > > @@ -487,7 +489,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct
> > > > > sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> > > > >
> > > > >         tcon->dclk_min_div = 6;
> > > > >         tcon->dclk_max_div = 127;
> > > > > -       sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode);
> > > > > +       sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_common(tcon, mode, 1);
> > > > >
> > > > >         /* Set dithering if needed */
> > > > >         sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_dithering(tcon, connector);
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > > index 5c3ad5be0690..a07090579f84 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h
> > > > > @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
> > > > >  #include <drm/drm_encoder.h>
> > > > >  #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > -#define SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV     4
> > > > > -
> > > > >  struct sun6i_dsi {
> > > > >         struct drm_connector    connector;
> > > > >         struct drm_encoder      encoder;
> > > >
> > > > I had more something like this in mind:
> > > > http://code.bulix.org/nlp5a4-803511
> > >
> > > Worth to look at it. was it working on your panel? meanwhile I will check it.
> >
> > I haven't tested it.
> >
> > > We have updated with below change [1], seems working on but is
> > > actually checking the each divider as before start with 4... till 127.
> > >
> > > This new approach, is start looking the best divider from 4.. based on
> > > the idea vs rounded it will ended up best divider like [2]
> >
> > But why?
> >
> > I mean, it's not like it's the first time I'm asking this...
> >
> > If the issue is what Micheal described, then the divider has nothing
> > to do with it. We've had that discussion over and over again.
>
> This is what Michael is mentioned in above mail
> "tcon-pixel clock is the rate that you want to achive on display side and
> if you have 4 lanes 32bit or lanes and different bit number that you need
> to have a clock that is able to put outside bits and speed equal to
> pixel-clock * bits / lanes. so If you want a pixel-clock of 40 mhz
> and you have 32bits and 4 lanes you need to have a clock of
> 40 * 32 / 4 in no-burst mode. "
>
> He is trying to manage the bpp/lanes into dclk_mul (in last mail) and
> it can multiply with pixel clock which is rate argument in
> sun4i_dclk_round_rate.
>
> The solution I have mentioned in dclk_min, max is bpp/lanes also
> multiple rate in dotclock sun4i_dclk_round_rate.
>
> In both cases the overall pll_rate depends on dividers, the one that I
> have on this patch is based on BSP and the Michael one is more generic
> way so-that it can not to touch other functionalities and looping
> dividers to find the best one.
>
> If dclk_min/max is bpp/lanes then dotclock directly using divider 6
> (assuming 24-bit and 4 lanes) and return the pll_rate and divider 6
> associated.
>
> if dclk_mul is bpp/lanes, on Michael new change, the dividers start
> with 4 and end with 127 but the constant ideal rate which rate *
> bpp/lanes but the loop from sun4i_dclk_round_rate computed the divider
> as 6 only, ie what I'm mentioned on the above mail.
>

tcon-pixel clock and tcon are mutual connected. The code is done in a way
that optimal clock need to be search. Now the patch that I propose is more
connected to the description I gave.

I need some comment from Maxime, what he prefers or we need to search for
a different one. I don't had time to check Maxime proposal because I'm working
on other projects.

Michael

> Jagan.


-- 
| Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi                     Amarula Solutions BV |
| COO  -  Founder                                      Cruquiuskade 47 |
| +31(0)851119172                                 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL |
|                  [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com               |