Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:26:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:26:09 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:31506 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:26:00 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-2.4.10-acX To: rml@tech9.net (Robert Love) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 22:32:01 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1002576203.8568.192.camel@phantasy> from "Robert Love" at Oct 08, 2001 05:23:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > getting very hard to merge a lot of the fixes like the truncate standards > > compliance stuff so they may not make Linus tree until 2.5 > > What are Linus's complaints about the faster syscall path improvement? He insisted it wouldnt make it any faster. Of course rdtsc and profiling counters of locked cycles show otherwise.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/