Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp7647329ybi; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:40:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0d0EfuRyfTnJUCKYsqd+jsSIMrGkxzbCdC+QbupmQno0cmH4TmMUoIwILuSYq6xYKZG6M X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1566:: with SMTP id b35mr79922799plh.147.1563842415269; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:40:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563842415; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aiVoGjP8tIdV2wAAfRtNSoMhrDWrsk/HhKllJwNxbvz7ZqOF5eWjxBqnTeVsLlDF+E poumly3gbK8FfZrwQKm8lCPAw+g3O1/PXSUBkwSofdn+m1+q53vvSoZTHjtdbtajZ2PC jm/a1Mw5+72kVTyzAG4WtuzicLAbZTUXWle0G4O9fMA0coUJvCFo1rqvRpxrs2qgxwfU MSMd6tEE5kaT9OVbmEuxBfp313pmmAHooGoC/VxFgIg4urAF+5qxcObMDCe14UYl4jZX FJWDS0XjU1BDlqDnqIbmaOtfx/A0BXpB0Y1PjYo3hbFkXS++FPdjZzwQDc388j28te1b 2RxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=6KipR/S6IFCWQO0Q8+htAdw0iFVd6NbNgip+SPbN3tU=; b=BnBtTqcfLmFk3AB9b1ofYDve7WZaDHxvooBZcwupm8V+5yyy394AlUC0hf8cIx99rK DoCXTOkN8XEHpyFV1dvyPPRG9BlQFvdTK4gtqs6zfFZesNMc2ZeZnoFDF60ET83BpECV WotjDssNJ5ZatYg9aOCTMaU+xqyAKKy41RbgwsoBfX+RvpjQcnxdOYCq/vA/0KcWkAsT 4aXsg8SfrJE//UBkKVgNh8xCVSwymdZuRysI9uhCDzRX+HP7wkt1EvJk8SfHfatcV3b6 fBdFUvDzKyEPSN92N4p15XST1fLbVwudiBe4x71BLIPw7Q/FtEPlOLKziaMJXA7G6PlK 0P9w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a5si9384444pjv.80.2019.07.22.17.39.59; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731159AbfGVSh0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:37:26 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:37886 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730788AbfGVSh0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:37:26 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hpdBY-0001gp-2Q; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:37:20 +0200 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:37:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Nadav Amit , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Josh Poimboeuf Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many() In-Reply-To: <20190722182159.GB6698@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: References: <20190719005837.4150-1-namit@vmware.com> <20190719005837.4150-2-namit@vmware.com> <20190722182159.GB6698@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:29PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > > +/* > > + * Call a function on all processors. May be used during early boot while > > + * early_boot_irqs_disabled is set. > > + */ > > +static inline void on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait) > > +{ > > + on_each_cpu_mask(cpu_online_mask, func, info, wait); > > +} > > I'm thinking that one if buggy, nothing protects online mask here. The current implementation has preemption disabled before touching cpu_online_mask which at least protects against a CPU going away as that prevents the stomp machine thread from getting on the CPU. But it's not protected against a CPU coming online concurrently. Thanks, tglx