Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751440AbVLFLXc (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:23:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751446AbVLFLXc (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:23:32 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:14805 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751440AbVLFLXb (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:23:31 -0500 X-Authenticated: #428038 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 12:23:29 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Bill Davidsen , Ben Collins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Message-ID: <20051206112329.GF10574@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Garzik , Bill Davidsen , Ben Collins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <1133620264.2171.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4394C745.2020802@tmr.com> <4394EDDE.30605@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4394EDDE.30605@pobox.com> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1307 Lines: 29 On Mon, 05 Dec 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: > >I do think the old model was better; by holding down major changes for > >six months or so after a new even release came out, people had a chance > >to polich the stable release, and developers had time to recharge their > >batteries so to speak, and to sit and think about what they wanted to > >do, without feeling the pressure to write code and submit it right away. > >Knowing that there's no place to send code for six months is a great aid > >to generating GOOD code. > > It never worked that way, which is why the model changed. > > Like it or not, developers would only focus on one release. In the old > model, unstable things would get shoved into the stable kernel, because > people didn't want to wait six months. And for the unstable kernel, it > would often be so horribly broken that even developers couldn't use it > for development (think 2.5.x IDE). So why haven't the broken patches (yes, TCQ and all that, too) been backed out at the time? -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/