Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp7759528ybi; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:10:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwIRrcJ8SMoCPhhVFNUuTBHBrg0nhs51qw6x2qlyiQ0X7kfDnU5+ycsQFcX6KNhG1INwKHG X-Received: by 2002:a65:5a44:: with SMTP id z4mr74553462pgs.41.1563851415544; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:10:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563851415; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yD7h22aquC6lXL4JR9MvTiCqpsEpBeNVsEoo3YxfCUoRxMjA5WMk2Ek1QJPKWx4RCB ls9cvfNgbhTOA4Ky1kGWIZ4taMFoHhbljjUYbvxBa37CvHw+angMbMH6DyOH2vku7HEx OWr9zm3XuHf9NaJK0shNDO9jHejczaUSbcKK333yINVgBQM+ujoMhzCwWH/Apn2g6c9m QY0yZ7xIlnpM50usdlo56yK0SOymjqMQuKTQEIJnfjkzhYnQvcL/1M6KfdmBsd4qWVEW jtkdTT7COLv5lgl+9txoLWUoSg5qiy0PFeWKsUk8E7/9/Ug6xk3MvFfNkWPIF+TKiQ8K 7H8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=5VssAIpTuFKmj2zUfyBOJyi8Rg6YT/l3GL1/5vXR4ZQ=; b=cOFSgN1qkJwgrvc9BKYnRT2zxrrhVMhR+xVkNtVOPZSFYdEZgnkdon/Iipm/VYDxH9 YiQjOVUebNFu32S7r1oSEK3c3z8TM5LYt2m1wzzsEWKiUlnVBc3ShdHZgZkTfrm+LLMq F0qXFtAWHn814b6YFx9gJG93FVB7BPYPkwtAJWhDD5G073BbtBkbIhZTFgL+OY5M/cz2 6wjbmDK5yX18eOW516qb2CFgnUyCVpDPfs9SR025vgrhHPJIa9K2fw0ieil/2KZSYgep Ux+hdz4hT49enM7BwV36qwPthlNBcnJ7SY3XafLaDHThD6t0Zcf789C28duwIQV1LfVp ygCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=dhcAjgoi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23si1906333pgh.298.2019.07.22.20.10.00; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=dhcAjgoi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732508AbfGVUMz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:12:55 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:38358 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726661AbfGVUMz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:12:55 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id j6so1669691ioa.5 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5VssAIpTuFKmj2zUfyBOJyi8Rg6YT/l3GL1/5vXR4ZQ=; b=dhcAjgoi9+qQzUWcowFh6AlTVc+cXX7gatGHZHks9JeKOOGWGHE25dYo58g5iTWmrD 3G/gh1KuafpOXHyPB3O9Kx6l0P+HUGpADF788Pho/ArJ54Y6THO8vkWWltGAd20KH+rG +YCXOMQ1JrFmhW9LQuw9Gn91Qi5wwFKaVWueo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5VssAIpTuFKmj2zUfyBOJyi8Rg6YT/l3GL1/5vXR4ZQ=; b=A3MH//6xSP6Poj2060QyXewsUwkatDCnABTOnrfax71XNzumMSda17kAZMLZh4pz3g MjYnIBLBmTAZu8+PCVRa1dOU8t4jwjR/RdVfrpvL2Ytv3ahh1J5WZMNlPFE0P/SSeMOe S0AvJsWhkPIysqSAQQhsoKVtZ5RZRcmBxBLgf1R+JwsVqQBzVoRLYSoE8Wb1RJY2Tx1Z sSyAt6bRLCbyxwGgheDGmS1S1FUIn88Yvq9ehL2b/M66tUl7x6oePhPwTb+xwE+g4HqU wkfZaGxAx52oRheyHgvzFbbRyKnB6k00MLU/jyi3/MFJ8YzLH+KM/tlb388PUtfgLz6c zeig== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCsOXgKBo3PO3lCn8KhkFtMBgsJLOwxvFXoY5ETVeqUolGZ9cc EtQIsFoIIohYgVmYGPuNdBcjUIMpfwI= X-Received: by 2002:a02:300b:: with SMTP id q11mr76505551jaq.54.1563826374123; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com. [209.85.166.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm30977223iom.69.2019.07.22.13.12.53 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id e20so46449133iob.9 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8f08:: with SMTP id c8mr66758646iok.52.1563826372789; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190722181945.244395-1-mka@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20190722181945.244395-1-mka@chromium.org> From: Doug Anderson Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:40 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: Refuse DDC/CI transfers on the internal I2C controller To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Andrzej Hajda , Laurent Pinchart , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , LKML , Jose Abreu , Neil Armstrong , Adam Jackson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:19 AM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > The DDC/CI protocol involves sending a multi-byte request to the > display via I2C, which is typically followed by a multi-byte > response. The internal I2C controller only allows single byte > reads/writes or reads of 8 sequential bytes, hence DDC/CI is not > supported when the internal I2C controller is used. The I2C > transfers complete without errors, however the data in the response > is garbage. Abort transfers to/from slave address 0x37 (DDC) with > -EOPNOTSUPP, to make it evident that the communication is failing. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke > --- > Changes in v2: > - changed DDC_I2C_ADDR to DDC_CI_ADDR > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c > index 045b1b13fd0e..28933629f3c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > > #include > > +#define DDC_CI_ADDR 0x37 > #define DDC_SEGMENT_ADDR 0x30 > > #define HDMI_EDID_LEN 512 > @@ -322,6 +323,13 @@ static int dw_hdmi_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > u8 addr = msgs[0].addr; > int i, ret = 0; > > + if (addr == DDC_CI_ADDR) > + /* > + * The internal I2C controller does not support the multi-byte > + * read and write operations needed for DDC/CI. > + */ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + In theory we could also solve this by detecting (in other parts of the function) the bad multi-byte read/write operations. That would maybe be more generic (AKA it would more properly handle random userspace tools fiddling with i2c-dev) but add complexity to the code. ...possibly a better long-term solution is to just totally stop emulating a regular i2c adapter when the hardware just doesn't support that. In theory we could remove the "drm_get_edid()" call in dw_hdmi_connector_get_modes() and replace it with a direct call to drm_do_get_edid() if we're using the built-in adapter. Possibly "tda998x_drv.c" would be a good reference. If we did that, we could remove all the weird / hacky i2c code in this driver. Since the bigger cleanup seems like a bit much to ask, I'm OK with this as a stopgap to at least prevent userspace tools from getting confused. Thus: Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson