Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp7905839ybi; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:15:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXp/eltNgBHyjveMySlcBlA2E7bv5NnXBuIQMRJIoaxLSwgS5TinFc6VwpYhC5/ekXKr7Y X-Received: by 2002:a63:124a:: with SMTP id 10mr74380379pgs.254.1563862558929; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:15:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563862558; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IVlDDFG4go2wjRmMX68D0Vj28gWoJqjCf2TvUqobRydLz1qVtIecfoToo/z1zrq3GV bMIQBQM2G0D0QwqTLmjDxHhZdB0N1otliBaIoCxsC2enMy2jhaXd+qLVJgVFj2C4oWE2 mRjj5p/h4KTvYN60d46IGaAUgMBBf273TKc4CR8y/Bv8f3C56Zj8TOW4MQJsi8QZI2rL x1vhD6Gontv0z+JhDhvNeefufPh7QNNvylTXeE7Uoznk7mOGQ22OS5o0zgIq7gpF5AeA 71wiqfN/eXAQ2oA5vf9e1KJJlT7S6rVdQspIV/Qg5JZoIPMTvGFG0py5mPPzOm/nWgt+ 3ZeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ZOg1aeuxZJaFRJcDsRuUUKvxXn015efnK/SXIIPlQmI=; b=hIp4Br+XQUuLQPthW69NsyU2I3cQ8q0KVXVK8JItbfqGh8b0VhEwEv+vRy1w2ZyXk+ gbnrBZOlWsYynhNhaIXrGznTkrNlQJxhL90LjfGxmO1Nqlg+PZBhBDF6n7DC4bjF0a1R lHj/xmUWVcxIwDC5enQfj21Ia6pQSZZIpzSUuWO2giaXcDcQCjyw8nLIv3epUDHJzFXa +EkexGhVXJIg72Zk9He28q0HH7yGYQiizjByrajlAFD4wV82JlcFaVZ99Exff4KRvipZ 2Dquc2fRsbJOOlgjCefHWheCq51YHWh6843ISIZIDM0eVnmPjVlFeOShDi+89iWTpVEg YR8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=TPiJKdZW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e92si10517729pld.312.2019.07.22.23.15.40; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=TPiJKdZW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730259AbfGVUwm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:52:42 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:37932 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726339AbfGVUwm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:52:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZOg1aeuxZJaFRJcDsRuUUKvxXn015efnK/SXIIPlQmI=; b=TPiJKdZWiDSAbJ1qm7pO/uUbz Gk+c2eqwI8tim/gYGiS0A9ux1cdl3GrmKTq8wiQ6kx39xW6HUZYkq91kJlX+rWNZuGPiD1qVdiQdZ XYbXzvW3o8HnOJU5qnYzEsiY4B17OxvYzRkuKHOkUUCSfFBr9mAO/3LtL4hBuPbW7dVmpKxNXHpxS V971ARy2t00/8WYUJZdtrovBoPgCbtq4kPln9u/dhb2KMGfYowuPG4WhVzZP/BzzkGrHQNXyekO8E grBDZ/28XABr1nQ6ZXBLzA/axg2wnzFQPX3CszXtgAwZyKSHdTVQel9/VQg0wIArUbLBI0U521ck2 Tf78XiH4w==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hpfIR-0006yU-OJ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:52:36 +0000 Received: by worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 47888980D1F; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:52:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:52:27 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Nadav Amit Cc: Andy Lutomirski , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC 3/7] x86/percpu: Use C for percpu accesses when possible Message-ID: <20190722205227.GK6698@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20190718174110.4635-1-namit@vmware.com> <20190718174110.4635-4-namit@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190718174110.4635-4-namit@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:41:06AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h > index 99a7fa9ab0a3..60f97b288004 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h > @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val) > */ > static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void) > { > - return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __preempt_count, e, __percpu_arg([var])); > + return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __my_cpu_var(__preempt_count), e, > + __percpu_arg([var])); > } Should this be in the previous patch?