Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 16/21] soc/tegra: pmc: Add pmc wake support for
 tegra210
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To:     Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
        thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, stefan@agner.ch, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc:     pdeschrijver@nvidia.com, pgaikwad@nvidia.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        jckuo@nvidia.com, josephl@nvidia.com, talho@nvidia.com,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mperttunen@nvidia.com, spatra@nvidia.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
References: <1563738060-30213-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com>
 <1563738060-30213-17-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com>
 <0b3d08ea-4633-8a54-ba66-c3f3146a1ece@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ca32c2d8-d752-3ecd-3a3f-232366730c7b@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:08:17 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0b3d08ea-4633-8a54-ba66-c3f3146a1ece@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

23.07.2019 3:58, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 21.07.2019 22:40, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> This patch implements PMC wakeup sequence for Tegra210 and defines
>> common used RTC alarm wake event.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> index 91c84d0e66ae..c556f38874e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@
>>  #define  PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_OE		BIT(11) /* system clock enable */
>>  #define  PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_POLARITY	BIT(10) /* sys clk polarity */
>>  #define  PMC_CNTRL_MAIN_RST		BIT(4)
>> +#define  PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS	BIT(5)

Please follow the TRM's bits naming.

PMC_CNTRL_LATCHWAKE_EN

>> +#define PMC_WAKE_MASK			0x0c
>> +#define PMC_WAKE_LEVEL			0x10
>> +#define PMC_WAKE_STATUS			0x14
>> +#define PMC_SW_WAKE_STATUS		0x18
>>  
>>  #define DPD_SAMPLE			0x020
>>  #define  DPD_SAMPLE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
>> @@ -87,6 +93,11 @@
>>  
>>  #define PMC_SCRATCH41			0x140
>>  
>> +#define PMC_WAKE2_MASK			0x160
>> +#define PMC_WAKE2_LEVEL			0x164
>> +#define PMC_WAKE2_STATUS		0x168
>> +#define PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS		0x16c
>> +
>>  #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL			0x1b0
>>  #define  PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_SCRATCH_WRITE	BIT(2)
>>  #define  PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_ENABLE_RST	BIT(1)
>> @@ -1922,6 +1933,55 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops = {
>>  	.alloc = tegra_pmc_irq_alloc,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static int tegra210_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>> +{
>> +	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> +	unsigned int offset, bit;
>> +	u32 value;
>> +
>> +	if (data->hwirq == ULONG_MAX)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	offset = data->hwirq / 32;
>> +	bit = data->hwirq % 32;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Latch wakeups to SW_WAKE_STATUS register to capture events
>> +	 * that would not make it into wakeup event register during LP0 exit.
>> +	 */
>> +	value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL);
>> +	value |= PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS;
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL);
>> +	udelay(120);
> 
> Why it takes so much time to latch the values? Shouldn't some status-bit
> be polled for the completion of latching?
> 
> Is this register-write really getting buffered in the PMC?
> 
>> +	value &= ~PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS;
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL);
>> +	udelay(120);
> 
> 120 usecs to remove latching, really?
> 
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_SW_WAKE_STATUS);
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS);
>> +
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_WAKE_STATUS);
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_WAKE2_STATUS);
>> +
>> +	/* enable PMC wake */
>> +	if (data->hwirq >= 32)
>> +		offset = PMC_WAKE2_MASK;
>> +	else
>> +		offset = PMC_WAKE_MASK;
>> +
>> +	value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset);
>> +
>> +	if (on)
>> +		value |= 1 << bit;
>> +	else
>> +		value &= ~(1 << bit);
>> +
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, offset);
> 
> Why the latching is done *before* writing into the WAKE registers? What
> it is latching then?

I'm looking at the TRM doc and it says that latching should be done
*after* writing to the WAKE_MASK / LEVEL registers.

Secondly it says that it's enough to do:

value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL);
value |= PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS;
tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL);

in order to latch. There is no need for the delay and to remove the
"LATCHWAKE_EN" bit, it should be a oneshot action.

>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>>  {
>>  	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> @@ -1954,6 +2014,49 @@ static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int tegra210_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>> +{
>> +	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> +	unsigned int offset, bit;
>> +	u32 value;
>> +
>> +	if (data->hwirq == ULONG_MAX)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	offset = data->hwirq / 32;
>> +	bit = data->hwirq % 32;
>> +
>> +	if (data->hwirq >= 32)
>> +		offset = PMC_WAKE2_LEVEL;
>> +	else
>> +		offset = PMC_WAKE_LEVEL;
>> +
>> +	value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset);
>> +
>> +	switch (type) {
>> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>> +	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>> +		value |= 1 << bit;
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>> +	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
>> +		value &= ~(1 << bit);
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>> +		value ^= 1 << bit;
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	default:
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, offset);
> 
> Shouldn't the WAKE_LEVEL be latched as well?
> 
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>>  {
>>  	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> @@ -2540,6 +2643,10 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc tegra210_pin_descs[] = {
>>  	TEGRA210_IO_PAD_TABLE(TEGRA_IO_PIN_DESC)
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct tegra_wake_event tegra210_wake_events[] = {
>> +	TEGRA_WAKE_IRQ("rtc", 16, 2),
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc = {
>>  	.num_powergates = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_powergates),
>>  	.powergates = tegra210_powergates,
>> @@ -2557,10 +2664,14 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc = {
>>  	.regs = &tegra20_pmc_regs,
>>  	.init = tegra20_pmc_init,
>>  	.setup_irq_polarity = tegra20_pmc_setup_irq_polarity,
>> +	.irq_set_wake = tegra210_pmc_irq_set_wake,
>> +	.irq_set_type = tegra210_pmc_irq_set_type,
>>  	.reset_sources = tegra210_reset_sources,
>>  	.num_reset_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_reset_sources),
>>  	.reset_levels = NULL,
>>  	.num_reset_levels = 0,
>> +	.num_wake_events = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_wake_events),
>> +	.wake_events = tegra210_wake_events,
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define TEGRA186_IO_PAD_TABLE(_pad)					     \
>>
>