Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com>
 <CAERHkruDE-7R5K=2yRqCJRCpV87HkHzDYbQA2WQkruVYpG7t7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <e8872bd9-1c6b-fb12-b535-3d37740a0306@linux.alibaba.com> <20190531210816.GA24027@sinkpad>
 <20190606152637.GA5703@sinkpad> <20190612163345.GB26997@sinkpad>
 <635c01b0-d8f3-561b-5396-10c75ed03712@oracle.com> <20190613032246.GA17752@sinkpad>
 <CAERHkrsMFjjBpPZS7jDhzbob4PSmiPj83OfqEeiKgaDAU3ajOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190619183302.GA6775@sinkpad> <20190718100714.GA469@aaronlu>
 <CAERHkrtvLKxrpvfw04urAuougsYOWnNw4-H1vUDFx27Dvy0=Ww@mail.gmail.com> <18fdcd2b-9064-6895-5948-feed65f96e35@linux.alibaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <18fdcd2b-9064-6895-5948-feed65f96e35@linux.alibaba.com>
From:   Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:52:07 +0800
Message-ID: <CAERHkrsgWh9be6Box_A2eBvKcR9Z5OdGQVDdGovSc7aQkNaGLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Core scheduling v3
To:     Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
        Subhra Mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com>,
        Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@digitalocean.com>,
        Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYyBXZWlzYmVja2Vy?= <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Greg Kerr <kerrnel@google.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:43 PM Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019/7/22 18:26, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > The granularity period of util_avg seems too large to decide task priority
> > during pick_task(), at least it is in my case, cfs_prio_less() always picked
> > core max task, so pick_task() eventually picked idle, which causes this change
> > not very helpful for my case.
> >
> >  <idle>-0     [057] dN..    83.716973: __schedule: max: sysbench/2578
> > ffff889050f68600
> >  <idle>-0     [057] dN..    83.716974: __schedule:
> > (swapper/5/0;140,0,0) ?< (mysqld/2511;119,1042118143,0)
> >  <idle>-0     [057] dN..    83.716975: __schedule:
> > (sysbench/2578;119,96449836,0) ?< (mysqld/2511;119,1042118143,0)
> >  <idle>-0     [057] dN..    83.716975: cfs_prio_less: picked
> > sysbench/2578 util_avg: 20 527 -507 <======= here===
> >  <idle>-0     [057] dN..    83.716976: __schedule: pick_task cookie
> > pick swapper/5/0 ffff889050f68600
>
> Can you share your setup of the test? I would like to try it locally.

My setup is a co-location of AVX512 tasks(gemmbench) and non-AVX512 tasks
(sysbench MYSQL). Let me simply it and send offline.

Thanks,
-Aubrey