Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:31:31 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, mingo@redhat.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com,
        tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com,
        mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, lizefan@huawei.com, longman@redhat.com,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] sched/core: Streamlining calls to task_rq_unlock()
Message-ID: <20190723103131.GB3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190719140000.31694-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
 <20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
 <50f00347-ffb3-285c-5a7d-3a9c5f813950@arm.com>
 <20190722083214.GF25636@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190722083214.GF25636@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:

> Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last
> week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if
> needed.

TJ; I would like to take these patches through the scheduler tree if you
don't mind. Afaict there's no real conflict vs cgroup/for-next (I
applied the patches and then did a pull of cgroup/for-next which
finished without complaints).