Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932596AbVLFOsz (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:48:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751669AbVLFOsy (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:48:54 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:60152 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbVLFOsx (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:48:53 -0500 Subject: Re: stat64 for over 2TB file returned invalid st_blocks From: Trond Myklebust To: Dave Kleikamp Cc: Takashi Sato , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1133879435.8895.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> References: <000301c5fa62$8d1bb730$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp> <1133879435.8895.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:48:36 -0500 Message-Id: <1133880516.9040.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.947, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 1.05, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1547 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:30 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 21:42 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote: > > I realized some 32-bit big-endian architectures such as sh and m68k > > have a padding before 32-bit st_blocks, though mips and ppc have > > 64-bit st_blocks. > > > > - asm-sh > > #if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN__) > > unsigned long __pad4; /* Future possible st_blocks hi bits */ > > unsigned long st_blocks; /* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */ > > #else /* Must be little */ > > unsigned long st_blocks; /* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */ > > unsigned long __pad4; /* Future possible st_blocks hi bits */ > > #endif > > > > - asm-m68k > > unsigned long __pad4; /* future possible st_blocks high bits */ > > unsigned long st_blocks; /* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */ > > > > So I updated the patch. Any feedback and comments are welcome. > > I think it looks good. The only issue I have is that I agree with > Andreas that i_blocks should be of type sector_t. I find the case of > accessing very large files over nfs with CONFIG_LBD disabled to be very > unlikely. NO! sector_t is a block-device specific type. It does not belong in the generic inode. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/