Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932613AbVLFOtt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:49:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932614AbVLFOtt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:49:49 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:45765 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932613AbVLFOts (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:49:48 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario From: Arjan van de Ven To: Brian Gerst Cc: "M." , Andrea Arcangeli , William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4394ECA7.80808@didntduck.org> References: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051205121851.GC2838@holomorphy.com> <20051206011844.GO28539@opteron.random> <43944F42.2070207@didntduck.org> <20051206030828.GA823@opteron.random> <1133869465.4836.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4394ECA7.80808@didntduck.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:49:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1133880581.4836.37.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [213.93.14.173 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [213.93.14.173 listed in combined.njabl.org] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2026 Lines: 40 > Once again I'd like to point out that user's purchase power means jack > when they only have two choices for video: ATI and Nvidia. You can't > walk into a computer store and find anything else (I don't count > integrated video on the motherboard as a solution, since only Intel > boards have it, sorry AMD users). Even over the web it's hard to find > anything else. (resending this since it seems the other mail didn't get anywhere) Sure. But that doesn't mean there is no purchase power. HP, Dell and IBM and co DO have purchasing power over NVidia and ATI. If they tell ATI or NVidia to either go open source (unlikely) or rearchitect their drivers to do the "hot IP" in userspace, it will happen. And YOU can influence Dell and HP and IBM again. By complaining to their sales people. By letting them know binary modules aren't going to cut it. Not just for video, but for EVERYTHING. Once the Dell/HP/IBM sales people hear enough of "binary isn't good enough", the message will get through, and those vendors in turn will crank up the pressure. And enough people have influence when at work a linux desktop is purchased (assumption I make here is that that's not going to be used for 3D games), at such occasions you CAN influence the vendors and let them know that the "binary" cards aren't an option. There are lots of opportunities to put pressure on vendors, either direct or indirect. Nvidia has a support department. If they get enough calls / letters about their solution not being good enough, they're more likely to consider the rearchtect solution. On the other hand, if everyone just accepts it and praises them for being a good citizen.. things will never change, and wireless is next. Then audio. Then SATA. Then USB sticks. Then Networking. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/