Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:34:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] backlight: gpio: use a helper variable for
 &pdev->dev
Message-ID: <20190723153426.GL9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20190722150302.29526-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20190722150302.29526-8-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20190722160908.GZ9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAMRc=McGTk+i0SzWN7AvGu3deYbXX_rJX=7+dKRpKFPKM_qxDA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=McGTk+i0SzWN7AvGu3deYbXX_rJX=7+dKRpKFPKM_qxDA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pon., 22 lip 2019 o 18:09 Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> napisał(a):
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:03:02PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > >
> > > Instead of dereferencing pdev each time, use a helper variable for
> > > the associated device pointer.
> >
> > >  static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > > -     struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata =
> > > -             dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > > +     struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata;
> > >       struct backlight_properties props;
> > >       struct backlight_device *bl;
> > >       struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
> > >       enum gpiod_flags flags;
> > > +     struct device *dev;
> >
> > Can't we do
> >
> >         struct device dev = &pdev->dev;
> >         struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> >
> > ? It fits 80 nicely.
> >
> 
> IMO it's more readable like that with the reverse christmas tree layout.

It makes more churn in the original code and for initializers the order is
defined by its nature.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko