Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp8974496ybi; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:15:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUL6ezVggHlMHqTb36eBpOPjT/ojxjTXh8fpQV04ytqJQIW4GVuWZPA1BmJ2vt+ih5Nvrz X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ba94:: with SMTP id t20mr35681196pjr.116.1563934526389; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:15:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563934526; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FmAAy8JqCsYvNFcgzMfJHg1cclZ7buCz3n4BB3YcEHfZgdiR9yin6kbOb12K1xLBlU PoxRW46kOKYFJdC8HJj8nPXpH3Yz1+zd9jfu2ri34B6lFkMgct7qh1bMd+hm/pwEiF9k UsJ3ShvdrlqXz8J0Z5M+awsF/z9jZkTrl+wpEaCYfWRPPBZ560FP/B0qSBnwVhxTX6f7 Ux/zA5SeQ1V3s0OOEYASdbvHMzqNJDjkTVIeGl6G90fip5P0cklSu3SdbvjHO4lNIf3A pTPEKIqSSl7WlkzAT70zvK34abc8sut1wFBVGFoWtZLHEJnUAZLjzQo4fw6T+SDaaJUp OEzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=KoRrGXS1xcEHJmR9YK4+5JQrZ37H5yKayrFqWfL3n4M=; b=NmyX1rCY7tZkKTpbqBxAKfjbA+69uj/UaTzApyndNpBJ/Yrxg971q4VTZnF3KexYI2 jhMoSniJyx0rGwwyl8pB4F4YHi/SKs+80LKUzwxKjkt/4p7cRaFNU4pktsKTu8muOPjE AzkmMuXmMSzWxWr2fEtqeZ/29K7woJC7nZaVtRgsFdyLexrImZ2BeXHRuIeeYsd/kqK2 vC5dpVkl6aTmVwW/+bEpuE5v4l39KFjdxdFLaVccu9tw4J91hjEEf8rKKg09L7Er7JXM CBNH2D+iTRvbr2z9ft8zS5jkk4qpStDKa/+JdIFv21QKx6uSQ8/ecoOQBwpsqSDpeONP E0dg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KD1ifaEV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g63si14304945plb.362.2019.07.23.19.15.10; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KD1ifaEV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390091AbfGWNLE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:11:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:33257 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728323AbfGWNLE (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:11:04 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id f20so10186720pgj.0; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:11:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KoRrGXS1xcEHJmR9YK4+5JQrZ37H5yKayrFqWfL3n4M=; b=KD1ifaEV5p7WnRGC0HNJ+qVWuOXp5bFQDD3BHmiCOTrRHyJxCD1acj+NzS633mjANf qj3MMUwF3gw7MrilS8jAjZDuC1lJ0rupY9Z0lpp6AAi5ICwhVg3HpbMqIcbN61z+6b3M X0OSdx1umYaZLuzU5u1s8eFwEDV3W2DyznyRzNHTXOrY8eE/a+WgnDVgvAG85VKCFfp2 TnaiRBneUcCsPFMM0Urvndy67GeHp58bOexgDUyWZQ21UogE8gRNPq45LjaV+HD8rylK 9TU3/iAboTNbadUuAGZts7QADaQQse2f2jAdTDOFpmyBDF9OuVDyl5m8VdSzZmXl6nQg 0izQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KoRrGXS1xcEHJmR9YK4+5JQrZ37H5yKayrFqWfL3n4M=; b=sfUxfAP/v91gTzvwawYrSaSkdmns1A1UAgpf/MFdldOKXDKUoeBX2cYR4LIAstdDky vp2+UcxT2QGZ5DVPwMS8FrTlXe0bipimL21Orr0yJQA/zBp4kRgUi7N8gMEn5ocIcbRz PgD3i/jqs2g+iFp8BaKekmsBkaGXqUQCO6b4Bizpbps0K3X/eSflI3N+LYY2JksyJfGk ZXqeVGJzzoJkpcpOqpnhUJNN32attrvmQAYfhpUdTq+O4i+OyYN01mTurPesZ+tq02TT sbvFHEPtb4B5nvEwUkJD8qkwwsBUWvfdqN2PxZIoPp+OO9RbNhI0xhmBVtSk3gvUy5yC NWoA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkt1+7OkY7/pFI50rpxIlC6qoynxbR2lHUEF6H+V+UaPx7hwPv JVS6P0R3KlcdvHJbqx39F3Y= X-Received: by 2002:a62:3445:: with SMTP id b66mr5757105pfa.246.1563887463426; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:500::2:2287]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r75sm59223117pfc.18.2019.07.23.06.11.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:11:00 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, lizefan@huawei.com, longman@redhat.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] sched/core: Streamlining calls to task_rq_unlock() Message-ID: <20190723131100.GE696309@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> References: <20190719140000.31694-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <50f00347-ffb3-285c-5a7d-3a9c5f813950@arm.com> <20190722083214.GF25636@localhost.localdomain> <20190723103131.GB3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190723103131.GB3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:31:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last > > week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if > > needed. > > TJ; I would like to take these patches through the scheduler tree if you > don't mind. Afaict there's no real conflict vs cgroup/for-next (I > applied the patches and then did a pull of cgroup/for-next which > finished without complaints). Yeah, for sure, please go ahead. Thanks. -- tejun