Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932220AbVLFQQ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:16:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932281AbVLFQQ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:16:58 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]:37850 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932220AbVLFQQ5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:16:57 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Crfj0DYAE77k6tjln/gUpSMXzCCF64uGLUM1sp1F/zuzT/8TsfUe7dKolsx1ddNXJDSVSv0hvCAhK38dCK5CX9HhGRLdnMIUEPejbC7Wsqp9ZbLRXaOiblrzZWXh0YktLR1cIMyAfUtFCZh3C1mI+OC+8PNcdq+6QgvVISuKbBI= Message-ID: <9e4733910512060816k26e12313y6b9a943d7cce4341@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:16:56 -0500 From: Jon Smirl To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1133779953.9356.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1830 Lines: 42 On 12/5/05, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Linux in a binary world Why not start our own Linux doomsday? Give the closed source vendors exactly what they fear the most, a patent lawsuit. Whining will get us nowhere, hitting the vendor's revenue stream will get you anything you want. US patent infringement provides the giant sledgehammer of having a court issue an injunction stopping the shipment of product that is in litigation over patent infringement. Note that it does not have to be proven that the the patents are valid. RIM is very close to having an injunction issued against it even though it is likely that the patents they are accused of violating will be found invalid. The game plan is simple. IBM and Intel hold enough hardware patents to take down any hardware company these choose. Donate one or two key patents to the FSF with a rule that they can't be used against the company that donated them. The FSF then moves for a patent infringement injunction against ATI, NVidia or other closed source vendor. The target company gets a choice: 1) open source the drivers and hardware. As a sweetener contribute a patent to the pool and aim the FSF at the next domino. In exchange the suit will be dropped. 2) Endure the lawsuit and hope the FSF doesn't get a $450M settlement like NTP is getting from RIM. Meanwhile watch your stock price tumble since the injunction prevents you from shipping product. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-ebay4dec04,0,6943666.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/