Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:24:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:24:35 -0400 Received: from artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.125]:44293 "EHLO artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:24:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 00:21:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikulas Patocka To: Alan Cox cc: Rik van Riel , Krzysztof Rusocki , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: %u-order allocation failed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > The difference between memory and vmalloc space is this: you fill up the > > whole memory with cache => memory fragments. You don't fill up the whole > > vmalloc space with anything => vmalloc space doesn't fragment. > > vmalloc space fragments. You fragment address space rather than pages thats > all. Same problem If you have more than half of virtual space free, you can always find two consecutive free pages. Period. You can fill up half of virtual space if you start 4096 processes or load many modules of total size 32M. Is it clear? Do you realize that no one will ever hit this limit in typical linux configuration? Mikulas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/