Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964999AbVLFSDV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:03:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964990AbVLFSCv (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:02:51 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:3309 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964998AbVLFSCa (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:02:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:46:21 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Florian Weimer Cc: Jesper Juhl , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Message-ID: <20051206174621.GD3084@kroah.com> References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <9a8748490512030629t16d0b9ebv279064245743e001@mail.gmail.com> <20051203201945.GA4182@kroah.com> <873bl7eh21.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <873bl7eh21.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1486 Lines: 38 On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:48:06PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Greg KH: > > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:29:54PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > >> > >> Why can't this be done by distributors/vendors? > > > > It already is done by these people, look at the "enterprise" Linux > > distributions and their 5 years of maintance (or whatever the number > > is.) > > > > If people/customers want stability, they already have this option. > > It seems that vendor kernels lack most DoS-related fixes. I'm only > aware of a single vendor which tracks them to the point that CVE names > are assigned. If those DoS-related problems are only related to local user DoS's, yes, that is understandable. If you have questions about this, ask the vendor, they usually have a good reason for not including those fixes. > Vendor kernels are not a panacea, either. With some of the basic > support contracts (in the four-figure range per year and CPU), the > vendor won't look extensively at random kernel crashes which could (in > theory) be attributed to faulty hardware, *and* you don't get > community support for these heavily patched kernel collages. Yes, the lack of community support is one thing you do give up with them. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/