Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:17:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:17:26 -0500 Received: from ryouko.dgim.crc.ca ([142.92.39.75]:60043 "EHLO ryouko.dgim.crc.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:17:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:15:57 -0500 (EST) From: "William F. Maton" Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca To: Richard A Nelson cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Richard A Nelson wrote: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > "William F. Maton" wrote: > > > > > > What about sendmail 8.11.1? Is the problem there too? > > > > Yes. Plus 8.11.1 has problems talking to older sendmails sine it uses > > encryption. > > Eh?!? TLS is an optional, negotiated protocol started *after* the two > sendmails are communicating. You anticipated what I was about to type :-) > I've not seen any problems, save a documented case with *one* third > party SMTP server (don't recall who it was). No problems here either... > > -- > Rick Nelson > Old MacLinus had a stack/l-i-n-u-x/and on this stack he had a trace/l-i-n-u-x > with an Oops-Oops here and an Oops-Oops there > here an Oops, there an Oops, everywhere an Oops-Oops. > -- tjimenez@site.gmu.edu, linux.dev.kernel > wfms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/