Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp9205945ybi; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:57:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmxt+QgcOa6tXFppeEZCQD5CodYZRpCd+yziBb618YuJm/8f0o5B40vZ8fZl8MnT8uABdM X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b582:: with SMTP id a2mr85700436pls.128.1563951435629; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:57:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1563951435; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=K2sgMafRZpRgpuUceKV55n318c/gCPt1ZrAijIHSuxQbxtJkEFwiN+B+oZyOlWKBHp sgFFkmSe5rpjJe+BYcdIcuBy1nSqF6tAIeMpoXlaF8OzNtE2hFU+Xd96bfJOGakSwt75 h5ocPL6mVXWylqFCnq8p3i1VrlinF9uvQKS9CJkd+UGr+YBJLUqE99Y67eWgoOuzED5V Kmu8HIHDd0ijrUjf++7gOCJyeu3Z/dhz83KmyVRqr4Hbo1SIW0DTvdL3GUMtmeevZWx4 Gn/JYUxlnZ2vuj03rBOpXPuEDQz+kBwmycDxBImr9rg4up2ACmlQesV4ImYtHj0tHFXX eItA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=4iMeNTsCiERl+P34fUTSUNSQriOGJih/vVFrylD6BeI=; b=Vy8fZGCbjkpARo00vrkDjHzssiyhWQ59AAw3PN2vauKzXdwpK/0aHXf5UwsiV4i4/S UsjABAZWoi1AKa0s0txvpsLyjjzeRe6kK/RVXxPC8pWn42yPKEWC4xpm8MkfsVF/JVNJ nellasRlglB1+QVA10NY2ZG2kcMp4vuQfJE7UOvjopRFKSTXdnNBn9A19xdcu9i7njSR g1acJ5R+MLV6/a3rnAhFfe6MqRJDj6Mos/C12XKkACQ6qtAnc5ngs3EorUeFpec43LBR 3Wu4ihmk0B05ZYfxaKqPjhJBiSvMt94LGZKLHihtMhlBz3rNyMuHVD//JqSVg/GrDyTP z95Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fk2lwvoz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e11si15701268pgi.121.2019.07.23.23.57.01; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fk2lwvoz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726148AbfGXGzB (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:55:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:45564 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbfGXGzB (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:55:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id f9so45590472wre.12; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:54:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4iMeNTsCiERl+P34fUTSUNSQriOGJih/vVFrylD6BeI=; b=fk2lwvozpFZQhIBd+22aYQwHfP0ddOk3rDZTodt7W2XLtZcbasVjL/eSI1ru8ghIJ1 GBpn13Gqf1w/c8bkgJ56GrQTR6gsyDziHRCHP3cDUkQxBsbU3Bd9ZrBMg0owv0xRfUuE siiEsoXj/Awey9XsUzEvzn5SVEnOWDqWakDX78f/0Y/cEbdpl1znF7iWF/6N4ZZwrWNw hUvSFih3el+1CSVnGqKAH3Oi8byJ13eUDAsH9tdsAFyzuM5C0k2ZqDi+Ygl90+ZXvcsN Q2SAOY2o8O7+rgSWrXr/piH57mFLzvfggjE69vullExS7m4AdTjorSQ8a8iraFI7P6JH h5qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4iMeNTsCiERl+P34fUTSUNSQriOGJih/vVFrylD6BeI=; b=LATjSssiYkiYzXwNvXn+JIuTCks983sLkCtDv0dZDkI5wwLprU/15xpK+1jO2aP4eJ 4S+RyORdcn4Rdqe0+7HZFZDwupX98tzmlTYzNPgjdmtRzNvfbtZ1r5L/KWrrF+5K3x1L 6bAlZSt2eYQKkY6M/KWfLDu+TK9ZfHdd/sT054BkGgnaYxPiIbL822Y9mDljC2QSkZh9 Z+e3iAAHdzXiRXufn5NeHcWv7YZep9caupQ2etEiS2xwTjcu8lFO02JfXtehFFY/s5tC Sjmpn9sBRyc6Gduv5P90ZRhRjZ+wOpAoiO7iRZe1R77b/2UzdLa+/cy8HmWTYxWz+Xsm bFAw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1KHIXPL8EFL4qKsxrsr8qbyQVq+9Mk/VSk3scBkHzhQhUjo5D OPI/sbqnsgwyupliykc8mfpP43KTPRT17xilTe0= X-Received: by 2002:adf:c70e:: with SMTP id k14mr88734339wrg.201.1563951297367; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:54:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190723084104.12639-1-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> <20190723084104.12639-2-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Baluta Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:54:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Sound-open-firmware] [PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: SOF: imx: Add i.MX8 HW support To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: Daniel Baluta , Marco Felsch , Shawn Guo , Mark Rutland , Aisheng Dong , Peng Fan , Anson Huang , Devicetree List , "S.j. Wang" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Olaru , Rob Herring , dl-linux-imx , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Leonard Crestez , Fabio Estevam , linux-arm-kernel , sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:18 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/imx/Makefile b/sound/soc/sof/imx/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..c69237971da5 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/sound/soc/sof/imx/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) > > + > > +ccflags-y += -DDEBUG > > this should be removed or in a separate patch. All right. > > > > +struct imx8_priv { > > + struct device *dev; > > + struct snd_sof_dev *sdev; > > + struct imx_dsp_ipc *dsp_ipc; > > + struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc; > > maybe a comment to explain what 'sc' stands for? Sure. > > > +}; > > + > > +static void imx8_get_windows(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) > > +{ > > + struct sof_ipc_window_elem *elem; > > + u32 outbox_offset = 0; > > + u32 stream_offset = 0; > > + u32 inbox_offset = 0; > > + u32 outbox_size = 0; > > + u32 stream_size = 0; > > + u32 inbox_size = 0; > > + int i; > > + > > + if (!sdev->info_window) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: have no window info\n"); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < sdev->info_window->num_windows; i++) { > > + elem = &sdev->info_window->window[i]; > > + > > + switch (elem->type) { > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_UPBOX: > > + inbox_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET; > > + inbox_size = elem->size; > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + inbox_offset, > > + elem->size, "inbox", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_DOWNBOX: > > + outbox_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET; > > + outbox_size = elem->size; > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + outbox_offset, > > + elem->size, "outbox", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_TRACE: > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET, > > + elem->size, "etrace", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_DEBUG: > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET, > > + elem->size, "debug", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_STREAM: > > + stream_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET; > > + stream_size = elem->size; > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + stream_offset, > > + elem->size, "stream", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_REGS: > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET, > > + elem->size, "regs", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + case SOF_IPC_REGION_EXCEPTION: > > + sdev->dsp_oops_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET; > > + snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev, > > + sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM] > > + + elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET, > > + elem->size, "exception", > > + SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY); > > + break; > > + default: > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: get illegal window info\n"); > > + return; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (outbox_size == 0 || inbox_size == 0) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: get illegal mailbox window\n"); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + snd_sof_dsp_mailbox_init(sdev, inbox_offset, inbox_size, > > + outbox_offset, outbox_size); > > + sdev->stream_box.offset = stream_offset; > > + sdev->stream_box.size = stream_size; > > + > > + dev_dbg(sdev->dev, " mailbox upstream 0x%x - size 0x%x\n", > > + inbox_offset, inbox_size); > > + dev_dbg(sdev->dev, " mailbox downstream 0x%x - size 0x%x\n", > > + outbox_offset, outbox_size); > > + dev_dbg(sdev->dev, " stream region 0x%x - size 0x%x\n", > > + stream_offset, stream_size); > > +} > > This looks 100% similar to Baytrail? Yes! > > > + > > +/* > > + * IPC Firmware ready. > > + */ > > +static int imx8_fw_ready(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 msg_id) > > +{ > > + struct sof_ipc_fw_ready *fw_ready = &sdev->fw_ready; > > + u32 offset; > > + int ret; > > + > > + /* mailbox must be on 4k boundary */ > > + offset = MBOX_OFFSET; > > + > > + dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "ipc: DSP is ready 0x%8.8x offset 0x%x\n", > > + msg_id, offset); > > + > > + /* no need to re-check version/ABI for subsequent boots */ > > + if (!sdev->first_boot) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* copy data from the DSP FW ready offset */ > > + sof_block_read(sdev, sdev->mailbox_bar, offset, fw_ready, > > + sizeof(*fw_ready)); > > + snd_sof_dsp_mailbox_init(sdev, fw_ready->dspbox_offset, > > + fw_ready->dspbox_size, > > + fw_ready->hostbox_offset, > > + fw_ready->hostbox_size); > > + > > + /* make sure ABI version is compatible */ > > + ret = snd_sof_ipc_valid(sdev); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + /* now check for extended data */ > > + snd_sof_fw_parse_ext_data(sdev, SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM, MBOX_OFFSET + > > + sizeof(struct sof_ipc_fw_ready)); > > + > > + imx8_get_windows(sdev); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > That code looks nearly similar to the baytrail one except for the last > line, we should look into factoring this. Yes, I got most of my inspiration from intel code. > > > + > > +static void imx8_get_reply(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) > > +{ > > + struct snd_sof_ipc_msg *msg = sdev->msg; > > + struct sof_ipc_reply reply; > > + unsigned long flags; > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + if (!msg) { > > + dev_warn(sdev->dev, "unexpected ipc interrupt\n"); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + /* get reply */ > > + sof_mailbox_read(sdev, sdev->host_box.offset, &reply, sizeof(reply)); > > + > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->ipc_lock, flags); > > + > > + if (reply.error < 0) { > > + memcpy(msg->reply_data, &reply, sizeof(reply)); > > + ret = reply.error; > > + } else { > > + /* reply has correct size? */ > > + if (reply.hdr.size != msg->reply_size) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: reply expected %zu got %u bytes\n", > > + msg->reply_size, reply.hdr.size); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + /* read the message */ > > + if (msg->reply_size > 0) > > + sof_mailbox_read(sdev, sdev->host_box.offset, > > + msg->reply_data, msg->reply_size); > > + } > > + > > + msg->reply_error = ret; > > + > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->ipc_lock, flags); > > I don't see a spin_lock/unlock for the get_reply in the Intel code, is > this necessary? Hmm, you are right. I think I've used an older version of the intel code where there a lock. > > > +} > > + > > +void imx_dsp_handle_reply(struct imx_dsp_ipc *ipc) > > +{ > > + struct imx8_priv *priv = imx_dsp_get_data(ipc); > > + > > + imx8_get_reply(priv->sdev); > > + snd_sof_ipc_reply(priv->sdev, 0); > > +} > > + > > +void imx_dsp_handle_request(struct imx_dsp_ipc *ipc) > > +{ > > + struct imx8_priv *priv = imx_dsp_get_data(ipc); > > + > > + snd_sof_ipc_msgs_rx(priv->sdev); > > +} > > + > > +struct imx_dsp_ops dsp_ops = { > > + .handle_reply = imx_dsp_handle_reply, > > + .handle_request = imx_dsp_handle_request, > > +}; > > + > > +static int imx8_send_msg(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_ipc_msg *msg) > > +{ > > + struct imx8_priv *priv = (struct imx8_priv *)sdev->private; > > + > > + sof_mailbox_write(sdev, sdev->host_box.offset, msg->msg_data, > > + msg->msg_size); > > + imx_dsp_ring_doorbell(priv->dsp_ipc, 0); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * DSP control. > > + */ > > +static int imx8_run(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + struct imx8_priv *dsp_priv = (struct imx8_priv *)sdev->private; > > + > > + ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP, > > + IMX_SC_C_OFS_SEL, 1); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset source select\n"); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP, > > + IMX_SC_C_OFS_AUDIO, 0x80); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset of AUDIO\n"); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP, > > + IMX_SC_C_OFS_PERIPH, 0x5A); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset of PERIPH %d\n", > > + ret); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP, > > + IMX_SC_C_OFS_IRQ, 0x51); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset of IRQ\n"); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + imx_sc_pm_cpu_start(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP, true, > > + RESET_VECTOR_VADDR); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int imx8_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) > > +{ > > + struct imx8_priv *priv; > > + int i; > > + struct platform_device *pdev = > > + container_of(sdev->dev, struct platform_device, dev); > > + struct platform_device *ipc_dev; > > + struct resource *mmio; > > + int num_domains = 0; > > + u32 base, size; > > + int ret = 0; > > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > + struct device_node *res_node; > > + struct resource res; > > nit-pick: can we reorder so that we have all counters last and a nice > xmas-tree shape. Ack. > > > + > > + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!priv) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + sdev->private = priv; > > + priv->dev = sdev->dev; > > + priv->sdev = sdev; > > + > > + ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->sc_ipc); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "Cannot obtain SCU handle (err = %d)\n", > > + ret); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + ipc_dev = platform_device_register_data(sdev->dev, "imx-dsp", > > + PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, > > + pdev, sizeof(*pdev)); > > + if (IS_ERR(ipc_dev)) { > > + dev_err(sdev->dev, "Failed to register platform device\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(ipc_dev); > > + } > > + > > + priv->dsp_ipc = dev_get_drvdata(&ipc_dev->dev); > > + if (!priv->dsp_ipc) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + > > + imx_dsp_set_data(priv->dsp_ipc, priv); > > + priv->dsp_ipc->ops = &dsp_ops; > > + > > + num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains", > > + "#power-domain-cells"); > > + for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++) { > > + struct device *pd_dev; > > + struct device_link *link; > > + > > + pd_dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(&pdev->dev, i); > > + if (IS_ERR(pd_dev)) > > + return PTR_ERR(pd_dev); > > + > > + link = device_link_add(&pdev->dev, pd_dev, > > + DL_FLAG_STATELESS | > > + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | > > + DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE); > > + if (IS_ERR(link)) > > + return PTR_ERR(link); > > Question: is the error flow final? Wondering if we release all the > resources/memory/devices on errors? Will check again. It seemed no need for resource freeing. > > Also are all the resources device-managed, I don't see a remove()? Good catch for pm stuff. We mostly didn't care about remove because drivers are always Y in our distribution. Thanks Pierre for review, I will let some time for others to have a look and send a new version. thanks, Daniel.