Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190722150302.29526-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20190722150302.29526-3-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20190722160603.GY9224@smile.fi.intel.com> <CAMRc=Mfuvh6byfPhPdB51dy_YbAS5scJQT3n3pL_5VZLCjB3Hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190723153250.GK9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190723153250.GK9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:26:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mf9MZRkvK5bvqsQuqwcUe5Wmsk+D7jwg2wMEK_cYVfe+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] backlight: gpio: simplify the platform data handling
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

wt., 23 lip 2019 o 17:32 Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> napisa=C5=82(a):
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:28:00AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > pon., 22 lip 2019 o 18:06 Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> napisa=C5=82(a):
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:02:57PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > > >
> > > > Now that the last user of platform data (sh ecovec24) defines a pro=
per
> > > > GPIO lookup and sets the 'default-on' device property, we can drop =
the
> > > > platform_data-specific GPIO handling and unify a big chunk of code.
> > > >
> > > > The only field used from the platform data is now the fbdev pointer=
.
> > >
> > > > -static int gpio_backlight_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > > -                                struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
> > > > -{
> > > > -     struct device *dev =3D &pdev->dev;
> > > > -     enum gpiod_flags flags;
> > > > -     int ret;
> > > > -
> > > > -     gbl->def_value =3D device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on=
");
> > > > -     flags =3D gbl->def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
> > > > -
> > > > -     gbl->gpiod =3D devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, flags);
> > > > -     if (IS_ERR(gbl->gpiod)) {
> > > > -             ret =3D PTR_ERR(gbl->gpiod);
> > > > -
> > > > -             if (ret !=3D -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > > > -                     dev_err(dev,
> > > > -                             "Error: The gpios parameter is missin=
g or invalid.\n");
> > > > -             }
> > > > -             return ret;
> > > > -     }
> > > > -
> > > > -     return 0;
> > > > -}
> > >
> > > Why not leave this function (perhaps with different name)?
> >
> > Why would we do that if the entire probe() function is now less than
> > 50 lines long? Also: it gets inlined by the compiler anyway. It
> > doesn't make sense IMO.
>
> I'm not against this, perhaps, dropping and moving can be split to two ch=
anges.
>

This really is unnecessary - we can do it in a single patch alright.

Bart